XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
   From: none@none.con   
      
   On Oct 23, 2023, James wrote   
   (in article<3e1ejipsdb3he3n0jnogmvqhrtevg5m0ei@4ax.com>):   
      
   > On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:15:08 -0700, No one  wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Oct 17, 2023, James wrote   
   > > (in article):   
   > >   
   > > > On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 15:37:40 -0700, No one  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Oct 14, 2023, James wrote   
   > > > > (in article):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 23:57:01 -0700, No one  wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > On Oct 12, 2023, James wrote   
   > > > > > > (in article<9bsfiipihk04d8m2664pt0n56m4th6fgf2@4ax.com>):   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:36:32 -0700, No one  wrote:   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > On Oct 11, 2023, James wrote   
   > > > > > > > > (in article):   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:11:49 -0700, No one    
   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 10, 2023, James wrote   
   > > > > > > > > > > (in article):   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > If the JW translators were bumbling idiots in Greek and   
   Hebrew, why   
   > > > > > > > > > > > did Bible scholars praise their NWT translation? They   
   should have   
   > > > > > > > > > > > called it a joke instead:   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > A carefully constructed lie. The "Bible scholars" were JW,   
   notice   
   > > > > > > > > > > the   
   > > > > > > > > > > word "their" NWT Translation?   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Nice try. They were no more JW's than you are.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > The language used there says otherwise.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Your OPINION is noted./   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > If so it will stick with you for a very long time.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > False teachings don't stick with me very long.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Now that is a lie. How long have you been a JW?   
   > > >   
   > > > Mucho years.   
   > >   
   > > It is Mucho Anos   
   > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > > And why is Jesus your current center point and not Jehovah?   
   > > >   
   > > > They both always are. Why such a question? People change their   
   > > > "current center point" all the time.   
   > >   
   > > Yet you do not change the title of your cult?   
   >   
   > Since we are not a cult, there is nothing to change. Look up the   
   > definition of a "cult". There is a multitude of different definitions.   
   > Some define it so as to make Jesus a cult. Others define it to make   
   > ALL Christian religion cults. Etc.   
   >   
   > Sincerely James   
      
   You are a cult, you preach a far different gospel and for that reason you are   
   accursed.   
      
   Re Paul the apostle speaking what God gave him to speak.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)