XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
      
   >>Satan is happy because friend james was led to do a wholesale slander of   
   >>all churches.  He said "trick or treat" etc. were promoted by *ALL*   
   >>churches as a religious practice as in the subject "Churches' demon day".   
   >>   
   >>Satan is gleeful that that lieing slander was not followed by an act of   
   >>contrition,ie. of asking forgiveness and openly repenting of his false   
   >>witness?   
   >>   
   >>Will satan continue to be happy with friend jame's failure of contrition   
   >>for his wholesale slander?  Satan's happy response is in friend jame's   
   >>hands, no?   
   >   
   Friend james tries to find wiggle room to excue his slander and failure of   
   contrition:   
      
   >    the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to   
   >a person's reputation.   
   >    "he is suing the TV network for slander"   
      
   Bingo; here comes the wiggle attempt at spin:   
      
   >Notice, slander only happens to a person. I slandered no person.   
      
   Friend james; notice the very example the dictionary used above, a "tv   
   network" is not an individual, no?  Thelf excusing spin continues:   
      
      
   >I referred to the false religions of the churches that misleads many   
   >people into Satan's hands.   
      
   Bingo, friend james is on the right path; he confesses his slander only to   
   spin even more: "all churches promote "trick or treat" etc. as a religious   
   practice/doctrine", no?  However is that path   
    to absolution blocked because   
   a slander repeated doesn't forgive it?   
      
   Satan remains happy, even more so.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)