XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.christnet.christianlife   
   From: seaviews7@yahoo.com   
      
   sometimes I Daniel ofm minim, get very angry at Saint Paul, \   
   Because he causes to much division on truth.   
      
   In Romans, chapter 3 he states this....   
      
   7 For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie, unto his   
   glory, why am I also yet judged as a sinner? 8 And not rather (as we are   
   slandered, and as some affirm that we say) let us do evil, that there   
   may come good? whose damnation is just.   
      
   So what you get from this, is people believing they do not have to be   
   good obeying the law.  Nothing is farther from the truth.   
   Since he makes the statement following this, 9   
   "no, not so."  See the period?   
      
   9 What then? Do we excel them? No, not so. For we have charged both   
   Jews, and Greeks, that they are all under sin.   
      
   Then he says this;   
      
   10 As it is written: There is not any man just. 11 There is none that   
   understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. 12 All have turned   
   out of the way; they are become unprofitable together: there is none   
   that doth good, there is not so much as one. 13 Their throat is an open   
   sepulchre; with their tongues they have dealt deceitfully. The venom of   
   asps is under their lips. 14 Whose mouth is full of cursing and   
   bitterness: 15 Their feet swift to shed blood: 16 Destruction and misery   
   in their ways: 17 And the way of peace they have not known: 18 There is   
   no fear of God before their eyes. 19 Now we know, that what things   
   soever the law speaketh, it speaketh to them that are in the law;   
      
   He is like leaving the way for you to follow the wrong way, after he   
   said "NOT SO"   
      
   Now if he said this, how is it, that any of what he is saying, could be   
   true?   
      
   Its not.  Yet he does this, I believe, to gain the one who is truly   
   unjust on purpose.  For this is how you steal from others, to lie to   
   them about the truth.  $$$$   
      
   And yet, he makes it seem as if its ok that the law only apply to the   
   lawmaker.   
      
   he says it now,  the counteract of what he just said;   
      
   that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may be made subject   
   to God.   
      
   that splits it right in the middle of the verse an this is why no one   
   notices this part.   
      
   If they are subject to God, then they would want to know the law of God.   
   And believe me, this, bs of Saint Paul, is not why the Ten Commandnments   
   was made.   Because through all this bs that Saint Paul is running his   
   mouth about, it goes right back to the beggining of obeying the law, at   
   the very end of it.  vs 31.   
      
   Which means, yup, merit matters and is required so says the Ten   
   Commandments.  But during the reading of this confusion just so Saint   
   Paul can drag u to those last words that reverse it all, Is to lure you   
   into the trap of obeying the law.  For it is the First Commandment that   
   does not give you any choices of freedom.  And this is the entire FACT   
   of God's Precepts with His Ten Commandments.  And is why, you must have   
   the laying on of hands for confirmation, and they must be from a valid   
   faithful.  Not, by some law breaker.   
      
   And yee dumb jws, believe, you can get away with your false vatican.   
   Same as freemason Jorge believes, he can be a pope when he is not one,   
   but honors Sodom and Gamorah as a justice of a just people, when it is   
   not so.   
      
   Now, i suppose you can all understand what this means?   
      
   manifest   
      
      
   So when you read verse 31 at the end of the chapter?   
   apply it.  Turns you back to Saint James.  Merit.   
   Making the chapter true, with a bunch of bs in the middle.   
   I wonder why I alwasys read this, when i get near a change it   
   protestant.  Its because, it causes to much confusion, and that,   
   is of the devil.  But Paul only does this to make you understand the   
   "Not SO"   
      
   It certainly reminds me of all the money the politicians have stolen   
   from the taxpayer and all the cheats they do to the people and then use   
   a verse here in the middle somewhere to justify it.  Which is, NOT JUSTICE.   
      
   31 Do we, then, destroy the law through faith? God forbid: but we   
   establish the law.   
      
   Which means, you best back up all yee liars About Maria, the mother of   
   Jesus.  She is the Mother of God.  NOT, the mother of the Church.   
   all yee stupid novus ordo anticatholics, Stop calling her YOUR MOTHER.   
   She is the MOTHER OF GOD.   The mother of the Church,  is God the   
   Father.  No one, is entitled to that title.  And no, God the Father,   
   does not have a name.  Adoni that only means He does not have one.   
   YET,  if He left it that way, there would be no way to follow the   
   religion that is correct.  That is why Jesus is the same as Iehova,   
   and is the same name, differ languages.  Yet that is caused by babel,   
   and if this is not babel above,  I dont know what it really is.  A waste   
   of time to read it, because you get right back to the begining   
   after you have read it, by Saint Paul's order to do so. Obey the laws.   
   Protestant.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   On 12/26/2023 2:34 PM, servant scribbled:   
   > Friend james how does the jw vatican commemorate/celebrate Christ' birth by   
   > way of the HS and Mary,ie. the Word becoming flesh to dwell among us?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)