XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christianity   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.christnet.christianlife   
      
   >>Friend james, after reading the following web page in detail to be in the   
   >>truth, what is your response?   
   >>   
   >>John 1:1, Using the New World Translation to Refute JW Teaching   
   >>https://carm.org/jehovahs-witnesses/using-the-new-world-transl   
   tion-to-refute-the-new-world-translation-john-11/   
   >   
   Friend james did not read in dteal why the nwt refutes.  He merely tries to   
   justify jw vatican excuses for not haveing *any* greek/hebrew scholars who   
   did the "translation".   
      
   >"scholarly translations (such as the NASB, ESV, KJV, etc.)"   
   >_..............................................................   
   ................................................   
   >   
   >Talking about "scholarly translations", let's see how the NWT comes   
      
   Nope, we are not speaking of/questioing the point at all.  Read the   
   question above again about the details of their analysis,ie. the nwt   
   refutes the John 1:1 jw vatican claim.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)