Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion    |    Nah-uh! My God is better than YOUR God!    |    192,256 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 192,075 of 192,256    |
|    Rod_E to Christ Rose    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFBBVUzigJlTIFBBWS4gUHJlYW    |
|    23 Mar 25 17:51:13    |
      XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.religion.christian       From: dx7066801@gmail.com              On 3/22/2025 12:16 PM, Christ Rose wrote:       > Paul clearly taught that ministers of the gospel have a right to receive       > material support, even though he personally declined that support in       > certain contexts to avoid putting a stumbling block before others.       > "Sincerely" James misrepresents the full counsel of God’s Word on this       > issue. While some of the references are accurate, the conclusion       > contradicts the teaching of Christ and Paul. Below is a thorough       > refutation where needed, and confirmation where accurate, based on       > Scripture.       >       > 1. Misuse of Matthew 10:8       >       > "Sincerely" James quotes: “You received without paying, give without       > pay” (Matthew 10:8, RSV) as a universal command against any material       > support for ministry. This verse was part of Jesus’ specific       > instructions to the twelve apostles as He sent them out to preach the       > kingdom to Israel (Matthew 10:5-10). But in the same context, Jesus       > said: “the laborer deserves his food” (Matthew 10:10, ESV). That phrase       > reflects the right to receive physical provision for spiritual labor.       > Jesus was not forbidding all support; He was forbidding commercializing       > the miraculous gifts (like healings or exorcisms). He explicitly told       > the apostles to accept hospitality and provision (Luke 10:7), not to       > charge fees or profit from their miracles. That is very different from       > saying ministers today must never receive pay.       >       > 2. Misinterpretation of Paul’s Example       >       > "Sincerely" James rightly cites Paul’s refusal to burden certain       > churches (2 Corinthians 11:7-9; 12:14), but he omits Paul’s clear       > teaching that ministers do have the right to receive support. Paul’s       > personal choice to forgo that right in Corinth was not a universal       > pattern for all ministers.       >       > Paul said plainly: “The Lord commanded that those who proclaim the       > gospel should get their living by the gospel” (1 Corinthians 9:14, ESV).       > This command came from Jesus Himself (see also Luke 10:7). Paul also       > argued that just as soldiers, farmers, and shepherds partake of their       > labor, so gospel workers should too (1 Corinthians 9:7-11). He then       > adds: “If we have sown spiritual things among you, is it too much if we       > reap material things from you?” (1 Corinthians 9:11, ESV). Paul waived       > this right in Corinth to avoid hindering the gospel (1 Corinthians       > 9:12), but he did not renounce it as wrong or unbiblical. In fact, he       > instructed others to financially support elders who labor in the Word:       > “Let the elders who rule well be considered worthy of double honor,       > especially those who labor in preaching and teaching. For the Scripture       > says… ‘The laborer deserves his wages.’” (1 Timothy 5:17-18, ESV).       Paul       > quoted Deuteronomy and Jesus to support payment for gospel work.       >       > Paul also rebuked the Corinthians for failing to support him, and       > described how other churches filled in the gap: “I robbed other churches       > by accepting support from them in order to serve you” (2 Corinthians       > 11:8, ESV). Paul was not ashamed of receiving that support. He only       > regretted that Corinth failed to do its part, and he had to rely on       > others. That hardly supports the idea that all financial support is       > unbiblical—it proves the opposite.       >       > 3. False Dichotomy Between Salary and Support       >       > "Sincerely" James distinguishes “provisions” from a “regular salary,”       > implying that ongoing support is somehow sinful or man-made. But the       > Scripture never makes that distinction. Whether it comes as food, gifts,       > or ongoing pay, the principle is the same: believers must support those       > who shepherd and teach them. “One who is taught the word must share all       > good things with the one who teaches” (Galatians 6:6, ESV). This       > principle does not depend on how often or in what form support is given.       > Paul received repeated support from the Philippians: “Even in       > Thessalonica you sent me help for my needs once and again” (Philippians       > 4:16, ESV). Their support pleased God and supplied Paul’s needs, and he       > never rebuked them for it.       >       > 4. Misuse of Paul’s Tentmaking       >       > "Sincerely" James appeals to Paul’s tentmaking (Acts 18:3), but not       > because it was wrong to accept support. Paul made tents temporarily and       > strategically, especially in Corinth where false teachers abused       > finances. He did accept material help elsewhere (Philippians 4:10-19),       > and he commanded others to support faithful teachers. Paul’s choice was       > voluntary, not mandatory for all preachers: “Nevertheless, we have not       > made use of this right, but we endure anything rather than put an       > obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ” (1 Corinthians 9:12, ESV).       > A personal sacrifice, freely made, does not revoke God’s ordinance.       >       > 5. Misapplication of 2 Thessalonians 3:8 and 1 Corinthians 11:1       >       > "Sincerely" James uses Paul’s words in 2 Thessalonians 3 and 1       > Corinthians 11 to suggest that accepting support for gospel work       > contradicts apostolic example. Paul exhorted believers to follow his       > example of not being idle or taking advantage of others (2 Thessalonians       > 3:6-10), especially those who refused to work. But this has no bearing       > on faithful ministers being supported by those they serve. Paul’s       > command was to imitate his self-discipline, not his refusal of gospel       > pay. When Paul says “Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ” (1       > Corinthians 11:1), he refers to Christlike humility and love—not       > vocational tentmaking.       >       > Conclusion       >       > "Sincerely" James fails to rightly divide the Word of truth. While he       > correctly points out that Paul sometimes worked with his hands, he       > falsely concludes that paid ministry contradicts the teachings of       > Christ. Both Jesus and Paul taught that faithful ministers have the       > right to receive material support. The sin lies not in receiving       > support, but in peddling the Word for selfish gain (2 Corinthians 2:17).       > Scripture condemns greed and manipulation—not faithful compensation.       >       > Every believer who feeds on God’s Word has a God-given responsibility to       > share with the one who teaches him (Galatians 6:6). Elders who labor in       > preaching and teaching deserve not only honor but support (1 Timothy       > 5:17-18). Paul’s example was one of sacrificial love, not a model for       > rejecting rightful support.       >               Thank you. Good post.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca