XPost: alt.christnet.christnews, alt.bible, alt.religion.christian   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
   From: usenet@christrose.news   
      
   ========================================   
   Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:03:21 -0400   
   <4pa8ujlprp5t2lr1dp71g6tollii0sqctu@4ax.com>   
   zebrabible@proton.me wrote:   
   ========================================   
   > ========================================   
   > Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:42:17 -0400   
   >    
   > "Sincerely" James  wrote:   
   > ========================================   
   >>> The NWT superiority.   
   >   
   >> Superior heresy maybe. This isn't even a translation. It's an   
   >> eisegetical abomination. See https://christrose.news/nwt   
   >   
   > My, how one-sided we are. You examined the NWT, but mentioned no   
   > others.   
   > Yet most ALL other translations have removed the most important name   
   > in   
   > all the universe, Jehovah God (Yahweh God).   
      
      
   It's actually YHWH, not "Jehovah". Sorry. You don't get to bang that   
   gong again with me.   
      
      
   > At worst, they should have   
   > kept   
   > the Tetragrammaton (YHWH) in the verse. They tore out that one as   
   > well.   
   > It's like the principle that Jesus stated. You point out what you see   
   > as the straw in my eye,   
   > but ignore the rafter in your own eye.   
      
      
   None of this changes a major Bible doctrine, like NWT does when it   
   eisegetes words into the text because they know that without doing that,   
   the Bible plainly teaches Jesus is God. For example, they repeatedly   
   insert "other" into Colossians 1, to deny Christ created "all things".   
      
      
   > And you ignore it when other Bibles add words to the verse. In the NT   
   > most all, if not all,   
   > add "a" for clarity. I don't hear you jumping on them for adding "a".   
   > Yet when our Bible   
   > does it, it's the end of the world. Some people may call that   
   > hypocritical. At any rate, you clearly are not spreading the truth.   
   > But if you are being influenced by the churches, that explains it.   
      
      
   Idem. Nowhere do we repeatedly insert words where 1) they were not   
   needed for clarity in translation, 2) the addition of the word   
   contradicts, denies, and teaches the opposite of what the Bible actually   
   states on a major Bible doctrine, such as the deity of Christ.   
      
      
   --   
   Have you heard the good news Christ died for our sins (†), and God   
   raised Him from the dead?   
      
   That Christ died for our sins shows we're sinners who deserve the death   
   penalty. That God raised Him from the dead shows Christ's death   
   satisfied God's righteous demands against our sin (Romans 3:25; 1 John   
   2:1-2). This means God can now remain just, while forgiving you of your   
   sins, and saving you from eternal damnation.   
      
   On the basis of Christ's death and resurrection for our sins, call on   
   the name of the Lord to save you: "For 'everyone who calls on the name   
   of the Lord will be saved'" (Romans 10:13, ESV).   
      
   https://christrose.news/salvation   
      
   To automatically receive daily Bible teaching updates with colorful   
   images and website formatting, subscribe to my feed in a client like   
   Thunderbird:   
   https://www.christrose.news/feeds/posts/default   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)