XPost: alt.christnet.christnews, alt.bible, alt.religion.christian   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
   From: robert@no.way   
      
   On Mar 26, 2025, zebrabible@proton.me wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   James the JW replies to AI Rosie, as a total hypocrite, one that is proud of   
   the hypocrisy of the Jehovahs Witnesses latest translation. Of which there   
   were others before it by their same “translators” that were error filled.   
      
   Not even once in the OT was Jesus spoken of as “Jehovah” he was spoken of   
   as Yehovah it he wants to be critically correct. And the number of times was   
   6.521.   
      
   The LORD GOD also was spoken of by other names that James fails to mention.   
      
   He an the rest of the JW crew also are hypocrites in calling themselves   
   Jehovah Witnesses, since they only witness about a false Jesus. False you   
   say? Yes, because the Jesus who they teach about they consider to still be   
   dead, they claim He is NOT God. Yet they grudgingly admit that Jesus, which   
   is also an incorrect translation of His name, is sitting at the right hand of   
   the Heavenly Father. Fancy that, since James claims that the dead cease to   
   exist, That they cannot speak, or heat, That they have no thoughts, etc.,   
   etc..   
      
   Therefore the JW spread lies and confusion, and preach a false Gospel, and   
   according to Paul they are to be accursed for doing so,   
      
   Also, ask James why he is a slave to the leaders of the JW’s. Those who   
   invest the monies they locals harvest and give to them as they are paid   
   millions to monitor the billions of dollars they have accrued, yet they dwell   
   in pride for never supporting their local leaders.   
      
   James is PKB.   
      
   > My, how one-sided we are. You examined the NWT, but mentioned no   
   > others.   
   > Yet most ALL other translations have removed the most important name   
   > in   
   > all the universe, (about 7000) Jehovah God (Yahweh God). At worst,   
   > they should have kept   
   > the Tetragrammaton (YHWH) in the verse. They tore out that one as   
   > well.   
   > It's like the principle that Jesus stated. You point out what you see   
   > as the straw in my eye,   
   > but ignor the rafter in your own eye.   
   >   
   > And you ignore it when other Bibles add words to the verse. In the NT   
   > most all, if not all,   
   > add "a" for clarity. I don't hear you jumping on them for adding "a".   
   > Yet when our Bible   
   > does it, it's the end of the world. Some people may call that   
   > hypocritical. At any rate, you clearly are not spreading the truth.   
   > But if you are being influened by the churches, that explains it.   
      
   --   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)