Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion    |    Nah-uh! My God is better than YOUR God!    |    192,254 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 192,140 of 192,254    |
|    Heinz Heinrich Spanknobe to All    |
|    Southern slaveholders often used biblica    |
|    01 Oct 25 03:31:06    |
      XPost: nz.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.fan.adolf-hitler       From: HeinzSpanknobel@hoo.com              There's a very compelling and strong argument for white American Christians       to own black slaves. President Trump is doing a good job at ridding our       history of leftist antislavery propaganda and lies, so now is the time to       bring it back.              The Southern Argument for Slavery              Southern slaveholders often used biblical passages to justify slavery.              Those who defended slavery rose to the challenge set forth by the       Abolitionists. The defenders of slavery included economics, history,       religion, legality, social good, and even humanitarianism, to further their       arguments.              Defenders of slavery argued that the sudden end to the slave economy would       have had a profound and killing economic impact in the South where reliance       on slave labor was the foundation of their economy. The cotton economy       would collapse. The tobacco crop would dry in the fields. Rice would cease       being profitable.              Defenders of slavery argued that if all the slaves were freed, there would       be widespread unemployment and chaos. This would lead to uprisings,       bloodshed, and anarchy. They pointed to the mob's "rule of terror" during       the French Revolution and argued for the continuation of the status quo,       which was providing for affluence and stability for the slaveholding class       and for all free people who enjoyed the bounty of the slave society.       The Negro's Place in Nature       Some slaveholders believed that African Americans were biologically       inferior to their masters. During the 1800s, this arguement was taken quite       seriously, even in scientific circles.              Defenders of slavery argued that slavery had existed throughout history and       was the natural state of mankind. The Greeks had slaves, the Romans had       slaves, and the English had slavery until very recently.              Defenders of slavery noted that in the Bible, Abraham had slaves. They       point to the Ten Commandments, noting that "Thou shalt not covet thy       neighbor's house, ... nor his manservant, nor his maidservant." In the New       Testament, Paul returned a runaway slave, Philemon, to his master, and,       although slavery was widespread throughout the Roman world, Jesus never       spoke out against it.              Defenders of slavery turned to the courts, who had ruled, with the Dred       Scott Decision, that all blacks — not just slaves — had no legal standing       as persons in our courts — they were property, and the Constitution       protected slave-holders' rights to their property.              Defenders of slavery argued that the institution was divine, and that it       brought Christianity to the heathen from across the ocean. Slavery was,       according to this argument, a good thing for the enslaved. John C. Calhoun       said, "Never before has the black race of Central Africa, from the dawn of       history to the present day, attained a condition so civilized and so       improved, not only physically, but morally and intellectually."              Defenders of slavery argued that by comparison with the poor of Europe and       the workers in the Northern states, that slaves were better cared for. They       said that their owners would protect and assist them when they were sick       and aged, unlike those who, once fired from their work, were left to fend       helplessly for themselves.              James Thornwell, a minister, wrote in 1860, "The parties in this conflict       are not merely Abolitionists and slaveholders, they are Atheists,       Socialists, Communists, Red Republicans, Jacobins on the one side and the       friends of order and regulated freedom on the other."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca