XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   XPost: alt.christnet.bible, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
      
   >>Friend james shows the jw vatican does *not* "prove all things" by   
   >>independent evidence:   
   >>   
   >>>God's name about 7000 in Bible. Most churche's Bibles zero.   
   >>   
   >>correction, it is not "jehovah anywhere, so what is it really:   
   >   
   Friend james confirms it is not "jehovah":   
      
   >Jehovah is the Latinized-English version from hundreds of years ago.   
   >>   
   Correction, it is the product of a rc monk in the middle ages who did not   
   know that an initial "j" sound is not possible in either greek or hebrew.   
   The jw vatican endorses a mistake, ain't that special?   
      
   >>'10 Bible Names of God to Know from the Old Testament'   
   >   
   >God's actual name comes from around 7000 times in the OT and is from   
   >the Tetragrammaton YHWH. Even if He is called other names, the primary   
   >name is the one used the almost 7000 times. Older Bibles translate it   
   >to the Latin-English "Jehovah". Even the KJV:   
   >   
   >Psalms 83:18  That men may know that thou, whose name alone is   
   >Jehovah, art the most high over all the earth.   
      
   Sure, they took up the monk's mistake in 1 or two places, nowhere in the   
   thousands.  The greek translation for God/Lord was used.   
      
   >No other name for God is used so frequently as "Jehovah" in the Bible   
      
   Correction, only in the jw vatican "translation", no?   
      
   >OT.(see also the American Standard Bible) But most church Bibles cut   
   >out the Tetragrammaton, then insert the words "Lord" or "God". JW's   
   >have fully restored it.   
      
   Smile, tell us again the jw vatican invented fairy tale of how the greek   
   of the NT came to use their words for "God/Lord" by the actions of "jewish   
   scribes" many years af it was written and being widely used in churches.   
   >>The nwt gets it wrong, it uses a english translation "God"; not the   
   >>transliteration of how it sounds. .  It is not "jehovah" anywhere in the   
   >>entire bible, no not once.  Yet the nwt is full of that error.   
   >>   
   >>Then there are 9 aditional names of course.   
   >>   
   >>The NT is in greek where the name for God or Lord is used only.  Again the   
   >>nwt inserts falsely "jehovah" for the greek words translated from the   
   >>aramaic the apostles spoke.   
   >>   
   >>>For those who insist on the Hebrew transliterated (letter for letter)   
   >>>form (such as Yahweh), why don't they NOT use the ENGLISH form   
   >>>"Jesus", but instead use the Hebrew form "Yeshua" or at least the   
   >>>Greek form "Iesous"? After all, they say Jesus is God. Cat got your   
   >>>tongue?   
   >>   
   >>Smile, because "Jesus" *is* the english translateration of the greek above.   
   >>The hebrew is not used because it is likewise not an english   
   >>transliteration.  Remember the NT is in greek not hebrew.   
   >   
   >The name "Jesus" came from a Heavenly command. (Mt 1:21) Which in   
   >Greek would have been transliterated as "Iesoun" (Iesous) See below.   
   >   
   >-- Transliterated, Unaccented   
   >Matthew 1:21  Texetai deHuion.  Kai kaleseis to onoma autou Iesoun,   
   >autos garsosei ton laon autou apo ton hamartion auton."   
   >>   
   >>Did the dog eat the cat?   
   >   
   >The cannibal ate the Indian who ate the dog who ate the cat who ate   
   >the mouse who ate the cheese.   
      
   And the proof eats the jw vatican's weasal word tactics.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)