XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   XPost: alt.christnet.bible, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
      
   >>Returning friend james attention once more to the question on the table,   
   >>why is there no evidence in church history of 2000 years for the jw   
   >>vatican;  since only the end of the 19th century?   
   >   
   >The true religion was not supposed to bloom big until the "latter   
   >days".   
   >   
   >Isa 2:2-4,   
      
   Come come now friend james, why are you driven to the OT to find language   
   into which to pour backward your theory?  bu of course it is in fact not   
   from you, it is a robotically learned plugin response from the jw vatican   
   who demands only they truely understand scripture.  Or until the next flip   
   flop on "understand" comes along to "pull their fat from the fire"?  A fat   
   fire burns ever "brighter", no?   
      
   Sorry, the above is not explanation it is purely invented excuse.  Christ   
   said his church would not fail, it would "prevail against the gates of   
   hell", or did He lie and His church was overcome by hell?   
      
   The jw vatican along with the greek/hebrew of scripture are ignorant of   
   church history.  This leaves them free to pour any invention into the   
   vacume of their ignorance without contridiction among themselves, no?   
      
   So the question above remains firmly on the table unanswered, over to you   
   friend james; have another go at it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)