Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.christianity    |    Christianity general discussions    |    141,674 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 140,196 of 141,674    |
|    No one to servant    |
|    Re: God's 2nd revelation; is it - Evolut    |
|    28 Jul 23 20:17:56    |
      XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy       XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic       From: none@none.con              On Jul 28, 2023, servant wrote       (in article<64c452c7$0$2245$1c4686b2@news.club.cc.cmu.edu>):              >       > > > Friend james wants to dismiss God's revelation on the nature and change       in       > > > life forms these paset 3.5 billion years.       > >       > > Actually 'James' just wants to go by the Holy Bible, which says that       > > God CREATED all the different life forms. Those in the past, and those       > > that are around today. God did not evolve them.       >       > Maybe someday friend james will pay attention to what he reads; behold:       > >       > > But don't get evolution mixed up with changes within a species.       >       > Who mentioned biological evolution. The observation directly from God's       > 2nd revelation is quite simple, do try to follow. For example; any of the       > dino species from some 60 million years ago do not now exist. Any f       > today's species did not exist then.       >       > The species in the past 60 millionn years did not remain constant; but       > which ones existed at any time changed. That makes no reference to       > biological evolution as explanation; it is only to direct observation at       > any time period.       >       > > For       > > example, a dog living in a very warm climate has a thin coat on. But       > > move him up to Antarctica and he will grow a thick coat. That is not       > > evolution. It is just changes built in the DNA. After this, it is       > > still a dog.       >       > A short answer, nonsense. Did the jw vatican really try to teach you that       > or is it just your current guess ? You will find *no* person in the       > socalled "young earth creation" groups who will agree with you on that       > dog fairy tale. Features of dog coats do not change if moved from alaska       > to florida.       >       > Here is the short version, domestigated dogs have been around for some 15k       > years. Each variety/breed emerged to serve a particular function valuable       > to those who domesticated them for hunting etc. during that time span.       >       > Humans chose in each litter to breed those with the desired features for       > the function they wanted. That process in all domesticated animals was       > exactly the same. Humans continue to choos which animals to breed even       > now. Any farm kidd can tell you that.       >       > Fyi, plants such as grains/lentles etc. now exibit their various       > features/functions for the same selective breeding reason. Domesticated       > animal/plant varieties originated from their wild forms, some of which       > have survived in that form.              You obviously neglect the elephant in the room, that being 4,000 years ago       there was a great global reset.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca