home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.religion.christianity      Christianity general discussions      141,675 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 140,314 of 141,675   
   servant to All   
   Re: Answered; Should prayers be memorize   
   25 Aug 23 16:05:55   
   
   XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
      
   >>Friend james seeks help to understand:   
   >>   
   >>>Matthew 6:7 "And when you are praying, do not use meaningless repetition   
   >>>as the Gentiles do, for they suppose that they will be heard for their   
   >>>many words.   
   >>   
   >>Hmm, given the subject line, should jw memorize and repeat the lord's   
   >>prayer?  It follows the above in   averse or so and must be related to the   
   >>above, no?   
   >>   
   >>The "meaningless"; or "vain" in the kjv is the subject and thus an   
   >>important key in understanding.  In my faith tradition the phrase "Lord   
   >>have mercy" is most often spoken in a set of 3.  Is that phrase a   
   >>"meaningless/vain" petition of God?   
   >   
   Friend james condems self:   
      
   >To pray by rote is not Biblical.   
   >   
   Ah, the answer to  the jw vatican using the Lord's prayer, no?  The frist   
   christians continued in the jwish synagogue prayers and practices, they are   
   recited often in a from each repeated in their worship and prayers.  Thus   
   friend james has condemned the apostles/disciples etc. based on jw vatican   
   definition 2000 years later , no?.   
   >>   
   >>If a jw prays "we ask God" and repeated as "we also ask God"multiple times   
   >>in a list of petitions; in worship/prayer does the above apply?   
   >   
   >It always applies. The prayer might list about the same items most of   
   >the time, but it is not memorized but is spontaneous.   
   >>   
   Smile, sure sure; need it be memorized to be ""repetition"" as above?  But   
   more jw vatican current ideas forced into scripture 2000 years later, no?   
   >>It appears more likely this is but another example of the jw vatican   
   >>pouring backward current ideas into words 2000 years ago to fluff up their   
   >>own image .   
   >   
   >Your opinion is noted.   
   >   
   Bingo, friend james finds himself left without a rotely memorized jw   
   vatican plugin to use and left dangleing, no??   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca