XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
      
   It is with great sadness we find friend james tap dancing on the truth.   
   Read the question and his totally unrelated response below.  His tactic,   
   make a response, any response just to have  a response regardless of how   
   relevant; valid or even truth:   
      
   >>It is better to be in the truth then to swallow and repeat a lie.   
   >>   
   >>Friend james can answer a question about the origin of the word "cross"   
   >>used in NT scripture: He said historically sometime later after the NT was   
   >>written its shape was changed in meaning to the roman cross exicution   
   >>device from greek "pole". That explains why 99.99 percent of transilations   
   >>use the word "cross" to mean the roman shape device instead of an erect   
   >>greek pole .   
   >>   
   >>Friend james; let's test that theory, when was it "changed" and by whom?   
   >>I'm not asking about the greek word for "pole"; just when the change in   
   >>meaning happend and who did it?   
      
   Friend james is deceptive in his response; he did not answer the question   
   off when/who made the claimed changes. No matter the test results will soon   
   be posted and the claim's truth shown; stay tuned:   
      
   >Any changes made did not come from the Bible. It's the same with the   
   >Trinity and hellfire. They also are not in the Bible. False religions   
   >can change whatever they want. The bible doesn't change. Staurus meant   
   >an upright pole, and never changed.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)