Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.christianity    |    Christianity general discussions    |    141,674 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 140,571 of 141,674    |
|    teslaStinker to servant    |
|    Re: Jw vatican flunks history evidence t    |
|    11 Oct 23 23:43:28    |
      XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy       XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.christnet.christianlife       From: truecatholicstaff@truecarpentry.org              On 10/11/2023 9:50 AM, servant wrote:       > I implore readers to read friend james response, the truth will be known       > in his attempt at . obfuscation his tactics are revealed.       >                     you know as well as i know, that they do not get attention unless they       change a word. And their sour pride, wants that attention, and that,       is why they called it a pole in the greek version instead of a cross.       Yet, the original was hebrew. It was a cross. and the facts are, the       Greek did not exist when the scrolls were written of until it was       translated changed from the Hebrew. Into Greek.              Its sad, but pride, is a mortal sin. No one will change this.       An Jws, are about the worst type of protestant you can get. Most of       them, are permanently apostatized. If I were you servant, I would waste       my breath on someone else. They do not care on little bit about truth.                     >>> How does friend james take the evidence, he helps me:       >>>       >>>>> The jw vatican dlaims the church in the first part of the 4th century       >>>>> changed the shape of the cross from being a pole to the familiar shape       with       >>>>> a pole having a crossbar.       >       > See if friend james refutes the evidence the above is unfounded, 2nd church       > writers described it as a pole ith a crossbar.       >>>>>       >>>>> Very very good, that claim is easily tested in history. When did the       first       >>>>> writings of the shape appear? Short answer; in the 2nd century starting       >>>>> just after the time the NT was finished.       >>>>>       >>>>> 3 church fathers wrote about the exact shape,ie. a pole ith a crossbar.       >>>>> They wrote in greek and knew exactly the word for chross used in the NT       as       >>>>> pole .       >>>>>       >>>>> Two of these either new John and/or was a 2nd generation disciple of       John.       >>>>> For any who might want to follow up, they were Justin Martyr, Tertullian,       >>>>> and Irenaeus. The last two have the connection to John.       >>>>>       >>>>> One of the last describes the shape of the cross like the mast of a ship       >>>>> with crosbar to hold a sail. The greek word in the NT also used tthe       greek       >>>>> word "pole" to mean a ship's mast and other upright wooden items.       >>>>       >>> Friend james ignores the above:       >>>       >>>> Regardless of the rhetoric trying to justify the cross, the BIBLE (1st       >>>> century) uses the word "staurus", an upright pole. That's just a fact.       >>>       >>> Bingo bigo, give the man a prize. Having not read to learn the above; he       >>> in fact repeats part of it; way to go friend james; thanks for the       >>> confirmation.       >>>       >>> The 3 persons above spoke an wrote greek. as said; they knew exactly the       >>> NT wor in its basic meaning was "pole". Yet all said that NT"pole" had a       >>> crossbaar. One said the cross was like a ship's mast,ie. a pole with cross       >>> bar. One way the greeks also used the word "pole" was to mean a ship's mast       >>> with crossbar exactly as he said..       >>>       >>> Not forgetting, two of them had direct connection to Jhon who was present       >>> at the crucifixion and knew exactly the variation of "pole" structure       >>> involved..       >>>       >>> Nope, e must go with the jw vatican which has no scholars of greek and a       >>> glaring ignorance of the 1st century palistine. Did I mention 2000 years       >>> later?       >>       >> To the readers of servant:       >>       >> I have already posted Bible scholars who PRAISED the New World       >> Translation. Either they are morons also, or that translation is a       >> scholarly work. Use your own judgment.       >>       >> FACT; FACT; FACT. The Bible uses the word "staurus". (an upright pole)       >> Let's repeat that.       >>       >> The Bible uses the word "staurus". (an upright pole)       >> The Bible uses the word "staurus". (an upright pole)       >> The Bible uses the word "staurus". (an upright pole)       >> The Bible uses the word "staurus". (an upright pole)       >> The Bible uses the word "staurus". (an upright pole)       >>       >> I don't know what else to say.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca