XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.christnet.christianlife   
      
   >>>>We have pointed multiple times to the jw vatican practice of workingnwt   
   >>>>backward to make words/phrases in sscripture support current "theories of   
   >>>>scripture" by word play; which isliable to change at any time.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>The most recent was the greek word for "cross" to reflect "pole" in the   
   >>>>greek NT as the upright wooden roman structure for crucifixion.  Ah yes,   
   >>>>crucifixion can mean impalement; take your pick; that word does not appear   
   >>>>in the greek NT either.   
   >>>   
   >>he Word play seems an infectious thing; the jw vatican relies greatly on it   
   >>to make scripture come out "right".  The disorder has passed to friend   
   >>james:   
   >>   
   >>>I never said it did.   
   >>   
   >>Smile, you said "impalement or exicution; take your pick" when it comes to   
   >>Christ's death.  Do pray tel; howl can we choose "impalement" when it is   
   >>*not* in the NT?   
   >   
   >   
   >I never said it was, You are twisting what I said.   
      
   Indeed; but you put great stress in the exact meaning/use of words in the   
   greek NT.   
      
   That is when I asked where in in the NT the word "impalement" was the   
   meaning/used for His means of death.   
      
   That is the question, not whatt you pretend it was.  So friend james,   
   denying what was never asked does *NOT* the question originally and above.   
      
   Go for it friend james; the answer if you please.  This is the place for   
   bing in the truth; not of vain "theocratic warefare",ie. to protect the   
    public face of the jw vatican from exposure by dissembling on the truth.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)