home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.religion.christianity      Christianity general discussions      141,674 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 140,884 of 141,674   
   tesla sTinker ofm minim to All   
   Re: Bliss; Christmas #3: What's wrong wi   
   12 Dec 23 11:34:04   
   
   XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
   From: seaviews7@yahoo.com   
      
   God told us about ignorance.  It causes mistakes severely, and is still   
   a sin even being ignorant of it in cases that break His commandments.   
   I can quote in many places on it, but i shall just quote this one.   
      
   13 And if all the multitude of Israel shall be ignorant, and through   
   ignorance shall do that which is against the commandment of the Lord,   
   14 And afterwards shall understand their sin, they shall offer for their   
   sin a calf, and shall bring it to the door of the tabernacle.   
      
   if its a priest causing it to happen, then God said this.   
   a calf without blemish.  Another words, a perfect one.   
   Believe me,  James, is in deep shit with My Good God.   
      
   So even james being ignorant is still in the sin yes.  And since he has   
   never confessed it, making no apologetic for it at all,  he is still in   
   his sin, which will be what sends him to hell yes all the ones he never   
   bothered to confess.  Because he certainly never admits his wrongs.  I   
   have never seen him say anything of the sort, of apologetic.  And that   
   is first before the confession of whoever he wrongs to, which is many on   
   here yes, when yee be a liar whether ignorant or not as he is,  he still   
   will suffer the penalty you can so believe that. Without a doubt, and he   
   is not even a true priest at all,  just a wing it guy.   
      
   On 12/12/2023 9:26 AM, servant scribbled:   
   > Note the false uninformed logic about 1st century birthdays.   
   >   
   >> 10) No date given on Jesus birth. Some think 4 B.C.E.   
   >   
   > And this is relevant exactly how concerning jewish birthdays?   
   >   
   >> 11) After astrologers and sorerers and shepherds visit Jesus, NO ONE   
   >> ELSE in Bible ever celebrated his birth. Is the Bible trying to tell   
   >> us something?   
   >   
   > Smile; the absence of a mention in the NT doesn't mean it was not   
   > observed.  Here is how it was used and why Christ observed life events   
   > based on birth; think of going up to the temple with his parents at a   
   > certain age:   
   >   
   > The jw vatican has no scholors of 1st century palisten culture.  With that   
   > kind of ignorance any idea can be suggested, ignorance is bliss, no?   
   >   
   > BIRTHDAY - JewishEncyclopedia.com   
   >   
   > https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/3322-birthday>   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca