Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.christianity    |    Christianity general discussions    |    141,674 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 140,884 of 141,674    |
|    tesla sTinker ofm minim to All    |
|    Re: Bliss; Christmas #3: What's wrong wi    |
|    12 Dec 23 11:34:04    |
      XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy       XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic       From: seaviews7@yahoo.com              God told us about ignorance. It causes mistakes severely, and is still       a sin even being ignorant of it in cases that break His commandments.       I can quote in many places on it, but i shall just quote this one.              13 And if all the multitude of Israel shall be ignorant, and through       ignorance shall do that which is against the commandment of the Lord,       14 And afterwards shall understand their sin, they shall offer for their       sin a calf, and shall bring it to the door of the tabernacle.              if its a priest causing it to happen, then God said this.       a calf without blemish. Another words, a perfect one.       Believe me, James, is in deep shit with My Good God.              So even james being ignorant is still in the sin yes. And since he has       never confessed it, making no apologetic for it at all, he is still in       his sin, which will be what sends him to hell yes all the ones he never       bothered to confess. Because he certainly never admits his wrongs. I       have never seen him say anything of the sort, of apologetic. And that       is first before the confession of whoever he wrongs to, which is many on       here yes, when yee be a liar whether ignorant or not as he is, he still       will suffer the penalty you can so believe that. Without a doubt, and he       is not even a true priest at all, just a wing it guy.              On 12/12/2023 9:26 AM, servant scribbled:       > Note the false uninformed logic about 1st century birthdays.       >       >> 10) No date given on Jesus birth. Some think 4 B.C.E.       >       > And this is relevant exactly how concerning jewish birthdays?       >       >> 11) After astrologers and sorerers and shepherds visit Jesus, NO ONE       >> ELSE in Bible ever celebrated his birth. Is the Bible trying to tell       >> us something?       >       > Smile; the absence of a mention in the NT doesn't mean it was not       > observed. Here is how it was used and why Christ observed life events       > based on birth; think of going up to the temple with his parents at a       > certain age:       >       > The jw vatican has no scholors of 1st century palisten culture. With that       > kind of ignorance any idea can be suggested, ignorance is bliss, no?       >       > BIRTHDAY - JewishEncyclopedia.com       >       > https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/3322-birthday>              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca