XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.christnet.christianlife   
      
   We note to date friend james has failed to show *any* church which has a   
   religious observation related to "trick or treat" etc. that would make the   
   subject valid.   
      
   Note also the possession form of churches' as tho it is in fact something   
   they support.   
      
   How can any reader not consider such vacuous accusations an obvious   
   slander?  Why is friend james not confessing obvious slander?  Because the   
   idea comes from the jw vatican; in which case confirming its slander is a   
   stick in the eye for the jw vatican.   
      
   He puts himself in danger of having his ticket to eternal lif taken from   
   him.  The jw vatican accordingly holde his salvation in their hands alone.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)