XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.christnet.christianlife   
      
   >>Having failed even one example of a church observing in any form "trick or   
   >>treat " etc. from the web friend james is forced to acknowledge his   
   >>faliure by an emptly claim:   
   >>   
   >>>Already been answered. Try something else.   
   >>>   
   >>No, not answered; just responding with a jw vatican plugin slander   
   >>assertion such as the subjec.   
   >>   
   >>Of course we invite him to now provide even one example of a churche's   
   >>religious observation; to pull the jw vatican's bacon from the fire.  In   
   >>past he said "go ask them"; which is proof positive of the failure to   
   >>produce evidence.   
   >>   
   >>All in all; the jw vatican stands clearly in slander toward "churches", no?   
   >   
   >Why do you keep posting the same thing that has already been answered?   
      
   Very simple, read the above again of your failure to answer by even one   
   example of the subject slander taught by the jw vatican.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)