Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.christianity    |    Christianity general discussions    |    141,674 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,168 of 141,674    |
|    David Dalton to All    |
|    Re: Joe and Jill Biden now optimally sex    |
|    08 Mar 24 22:26:17    |
      b22b8c37       63a173af       XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.religion.christian.catholic,       alt.religion.christian       XPost: alt.christian.religion, alt.atheism       From: dalton@nfld.com              On Mar 8, 2024, David Dalton wrote       (in article<0001HW.2B9AC4E90059A96670000880838F@news.eternal-september.org>):              > Here is an excerpt from my       > “International Women’s Day attempt” thread       > on alt.religion.druid, that might be of interest:       >       > "But note that time has advanced such that Joe and Jill Biden       > no longer have had at least one temporary breakup of more       > than a week in the last five years, so in A-HDBE Joe went       > from straight-type-1-M to straight-type-2-M and is now       > optimally compatible with bif (woman attracted to both       > genders) Jill, and they have not been broken up. Thus my       > matches of a few years ago of Joe to Bette Midler and       > Jill to Ron Howard are no longer valid. And the optimal       > sexual compatibility should contribute to their physical       > and mental health. Yes, b’y, then. :-) “       >       > However, they won’t be locked for life until they next have sex.              I jumped the gun last night, but the above should now       be true, as of 8:34 p.m. EST March 8, 2024, the       fifth anniversary of the start of my first accurate       matchmaking period (and International Women’s Day).              They can test optimal sexual compatibility by       electric, warming, compatible touch, increased       attraction, and increased orgasm intensity.              Why would they have been broken up? As a country       leader, Joe Biden is an assisted shaktipat recipient (a.s.r.).       And a.s.r. will lose partial sexual compatibility, so       relationships involving at least one a.s.r. that are       not optimally sexually compatible to start with or       made so by (A,F)-HDBE will be broken up. So it is       not that the relationship has been abusive.              On the other hand, Donald and Melania Trump (neither       of whom is an a.s.r.) have been separated across       species boundaries in the species split, so their       relationship must have been abusive. A good match       for Melania is Chris Isaak, and a good match for       Donald is Sarah Palin.              --       David Dalton dalton@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)       https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)       “And the cart is on a wheel; And the wheel is on a hill;       And the hill is shifting sand; And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca