Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.christianity    |    Christianity general discussions    |    141,674 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,182 of 141,674    |
|    servant to All    |
|    4th request: A jw vatican ritual using m    |
|    14 Mar 24 19:18:10    |
      XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy       XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.christnet.christianlife              Friend james rpeats a very flawed in logic jw vatican exuse as to claims of       pagan origins:              >Thus, the KEY to       whether a situation with a suspected pagan source is       >ok to do, is if that situation is done with FALSE RELIGIOUS PRACTICES.       >       >So since there is no false religious practices being done at a JW       >weddings, they can do pretty much what they want.              Sorry bub, what is practiced are pagan "false religion practices".       >              >But you might say, wait a minute. JW's don't celebrate Easter because       >of its link to paganism. (ex; fertility symbols of colored eggs &       >rabbits) Yet people today don't perform those pagan religious       >practices when celebrating Easter. So it should be allowed.       >       >That's what they think. But the act of coloring eggs was in itself a       >part of the pagan worship. Also, the bringing in of rabbits with       >Easter, etc, was all part of that worship.              What a total hoot; apply the exact same jw vatican excuse above and its       jusst fine,ie. it is not done with any rligious intention just like       coloring eggs.              >That's when we go to the Bible for clarification. None of Jesus       >apostles and Paul, celebrated Jesus'resurrection. ZERO. The Bible       >clearly says to celebrate his DEATH, but not his resurrection. (              The logical fallacy of argument from silence,ie. it aint't mentioned so it       wasn't an commemorated event. But it is in the NT; the 1st century       christians continued to observe passover. The non-germanic origin       languages have the name as their version of "passover",ie. in greek pasha       the word used in the NT greek. Very early in church history passober was       not observed; but tthe religious events concerning Christ were commemorated       at the time of jewish passover each year.              >And with Easter, even the name "Easter" is of the pagan sex              Sorry bub, just aint' true, read above. The word "easter" is of germanic       origin and means spring even in the modern german version. "Easter" is the       vrrsion in modern english only.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca