XPost: alt.bible, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.christnet.christianlife   
   From: truecatholicstaff@truecarpentry.org   
      
   Servant,  this nut could care less about the seven brothers or the seven   
   sacraments.    He is an antichrist.  The second book of Machabees, shows   
   us this story of the 7.  That were all persecuted and killed the same   
   way at the end, being fried in a fry pan.   
      
   And for certain, he does not acknowledge the pains that the true church   
   being persecuted of, went thru, The Saints, being punished for no good   
   reasons.   Yes the jews.   And its fact, that they foretold the coming   
   of Jesus, these same people, in how they died,  and also, what he was   
   going to do upon coming, and addressed him Jesus, as the King.   
      
   So its not just the book of Daniel, that foretold of the coming of   
   Christ.   Yet, the protestants seperate the books, and shuv the second   
   book of Maccabees where the sun does no shine.    Just as they have no   
   idea of Moses and the book of Canticles, or the prophecys of the coming   
   of Christ by more than just one prophet.  As yes there were quite a few   
   that told us...  This is the second book of Mac.  7 vs 9   
     9 And when he was at the last gasp, he said thus: Thou indeed, O most   
   wicked man, destroyest us out of this present life: but the King of the   
   world will raise us up, who die for his laws, in the resurrection of   
   eternal life.   
      
   Just as they did,  I will do the same, and even if it means, calling   
   these who changed the books, evil heretics, because they never speak the   
   truth about God, and His Saints or His Prophets.  And how many foretold   
   the coming of Him, in the Old testament books.   
      
   And how, they are to do, in order to get to heaven raised again from the   
   dead.   
      
   10 After him the third was made a mocking stock, and when he was   
   required, he quickly put forth his tongue, and courageously stretched   
   out his hands:   
      
   11 And said with confidence: These   
      
   1 have from heaven, but for the laws of God I now despise them: because   
   I hope to receive them again from him.   
      
   So you see, they trashed the laws, and the next one that died prayed to   
   God to get the laws again,  and believe me, that is why in the true   
   Bible, it declares the true tabernacle, true religion, etc, because   
   there are others, that do not as God said to do to obtain the truth of   
   rising again from the dead.   James of course, is just one of those   
   dummys that breaks the catholic laws an precepts.  Same as these same   
   kings and the king james version, are the ones that did the   
   persecutions.  And still, they do not pay attention to what the truth of   
   the whole thing is, for second book of machabees, was just before the   
   coming of Christ, according to the cronaolgy, the year, 3820 to about   
   3898.  And, 5757 is a hebrew calendar you would have to use, and is the   
   year, 1998 in case your wondering, where and when is that time really.   
   That puts it about 100 years before Christ was born.  So do never think   
   God's seven people that were brutally murdered for God, never did tell   
   about the coming of Jesus, they did.  Of course when Daniel foretold it,   
   it was way back further before about 700 year before.  and Isaiah,  I   
   have not it at the top of my brain to mention here, but the true   
   Chronology sure helps alot, and since the catholic church is that old,   
   she holds the most precious information of the holy.   Why is there   
   seven sacraments?   Why did Jesus say listen to Moses?   Why does James,   
   buck the true catholic church?  I  think you know why.  It a little pain   
   in the ass liar, that kills the church from talking.  It has always been   
   this way,  They even did it to St Peter after they did it to Jesus.  And   
     now,  James does it too.   
      
   On 3/15/2024 12:17 PM, servant wrote:   
   >>> These are the direct from pagan practices the jw wedding ritual uses.   
   >>>   
   >>> 1. bride maids fdressed alike.   
   >>>   
   >>> 2 The brides dress color and use of a vail.   
   >>>   
   >>> 3. Use of and exchange of rings; and the finger upon which it is worn.   
   >>>   
   >>> 4. the brides bouquet of flowers.   
   >>>   
   >>> 5 having and cutting a cake and passing it around.   
   >   
   > Friend james offers this jw vatican excuse for using pagan originated   
   > practices:   
   >   
   >> Thus, the KEY to whether a situation with a suspected pagan source is ok   
   >> to do, is if that situation is done with FALSE RELIGIOUS PRACTICES.   
   >> Servant needs to remember this, since he has brought it up several times   
   >> before.   
   >>   
   >> So since there is no false religious practices being done at a JW   
   >> weddings, they can do pretty much what they want.   
   >   
   > Hmm; let's test that clam of friend james in the last sentence as to the   
   > excuse and weddings.   
   >   
   > 1. jw wedding pagan originated/pracices are vnot said to apply; friend   
   > james does not show us the explicit linkage from jw vatican sources to that   
   > end.   
   >   
   > 2. in direct contridiction for using the excuse for the pagan wedding   
   > items;the jw vatican has explicity forbidden tossing confetti/rice at   
   > wedings. because it is pagan in origin/practice.  Cllearly nothing makes it   
   > any different then all the other items above.   
   >   
   > As tested; the jw vatican excuse is not included for jw pagan weding   
   > practices.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)