XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.ufo.reports   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/2/2025 3:50 PM, Andrew wrote:   
   > "Attila" wrote in message   
   > news:42ea6kl14e750g85r9o0oo2p9ckn0pa1ak@4ax.com...   
   > "Andrew" wrote:   
   >>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   >>>> Andrew wrote:   
   >>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> name a single miracle; name a single scientific paper in the last   
   >>>>>> 40 years that appeals to "God" as being an explanation for anything.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>                                 
    Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  DNA   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> DNA is a molecule that contains the specific instructions for the   
   >>>>> synthesis of ~~~ every living thing~~~ The prime origin of these   
   >>>>> instructions that are in digital code format could of necessity -   
   >>>>> only- be from a source of Intelligence.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Our most awesome Creator.....   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>  GOD   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Okay, you didn't answer my question, and that is fine.   
   >>>   
   >>> There has been abundant scientific evidence in the   
   >>> last 40 years, as well an since the very beginning of   
   >>> time telling us that there has been a super Intelligence   
   >>> involved in our existence.   
   >>   
   >> Such as what?  Direct evidence, not indirect evidence.   
   >   
   > I just posted direct evidence above..   
   >   
   > If you can't see it, that tells us you don't want to see it.   
   >   
   > But then that would tell us that you were a fool.   
   >   
   >>> "A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that   
   >>>  a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as  with   
   >>> chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind  forces worth   
   >>> speaking about in nature. The numbers one  calculates from the facts   
   >>> seem to me so overwhelming as  to put this conclusion almost beyond   
   >>> question."                           ~ Fred   
   Hoyle, astrophysicist   
   >>   
   >> Opinion without supporting fact.   
   >   
   > Rather the conclusion of a scientist after examining the evidence.   
   >   
   > "From my earliest training as a scientist I was very strongly   
   > brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind   
   > of deliberate creation. That notion has had to be painfully shed. I am   
   > quite uncomfortable in this situation, the state of mind I now find   
   > myself in. But there is no logical way out of it. I now find myself   
   > driven to this position by logic. There is no other way in which we   
   > can understand the precise ordering of the chemicals of life except to   
   > invoke the creations on a cosmic scale. . . We were hoping as   
   > scientists that there would be a way round our conclusion, but there   
   > isn't."            ~ Sir Frederick Hoyle and Chandra Wickramsinghe,   
      
   Was Professor Hoyle an atheist?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)