XPost: talk.religion.buddhism, alt.zen, alt.philosophy.zen   
   XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy   
   From: epsteinrob@yahoo.com   
      
   Evelyn wrote:   
      
   >   
   > "halfawake" wrote in message   
   > news:i4afcv$cf5$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >   
   >> Evelyn wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> "Julian" wrote in message   
   >>> news:i48e8n$7ev$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 15/08/2010 03:14, halfawake wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 14/08/2010 13:47, possum wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Julian" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:i45tgh$787$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 14/08/2010 11:53, possum wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "Julian" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>> news:i45nhs$kqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 14/08/2010 09:14, halfawake wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2010 18:21, DT wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Evelyn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "DT" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:i418a202llk@news3.newsguy.com...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evelyn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Julian" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:i40qsf$hbn$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2010 13:10, Jigme Dorje wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 12, 5:18 am,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2010 08:18, halfawake wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/08/2010 11:39, Catawumpus wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> halfawake:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fake conversation is between you and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ass. Hope   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're having a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fake conversation is the one Evelyn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> admitted to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when she denied she was offering a real one.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which makes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect sense in light of all the fake   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accusations she's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tossed.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are not fake. They are real accusations   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsubstantiated.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't expect anything else after the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Occultists, and the so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Korean Zen" and Tibetanista teachers, have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> profoundly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twisted her   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melon,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> man.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you really want to get occult, try the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assertions of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lotus Sutra,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> largely based on supernaturalism and magical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are keen and verbose in seeking evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> respect to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tibetan foetid rascalities before you'll cease   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deny such   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, proving a negative was never my strong suit, since   
   >>>>>>>>>>> it is   
   >>>>>>>>>>> impossible. One doesn't take assertions that have no   
   >>>>>>>>>>> evidence and find   
   >>>>>>>>>>> evidence to refute it. I challenge you to find evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>> that there is n   
   >>>>>>>>>>> such thing as a unicorn. Prove it. You can't. If you   
   >>>>>>>>>>> assert that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Tibetan lamas have done something you have to provide   
   >>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> evidence, and   
   >>>>>>>>>>> it has to be real evidence or it is pure bullshit. That   
   >>>>>>>>>>> won't stop you   
   >>>>>>>>>>> from saying it is true over and over again will it?   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Asserting things to   
   >>>>>>>>>>> exist that have no evidence is a strength of yours and   
   >>>>>>>>>>> other   
   >>>>>>>>>>> anti-Tibetan ideologues. You find a book with   
   >>>>>>>>>>> unsubstantiated assertions   
   >>>>>>>>>>> and use it as a citation, or a picture that is   
   >>>>>>>>>>> supposedly   
   >>>>>>>>>>> of skin taken   
   >>>>>>>>>>> from living people with no evidence to support it and   
   >>>>>>>>>>> then go on about   
   >>>>>>>>>>> it as if it were proven. And that is the worst kind of   
   >>>>>>>>>>> propaganda. If   
   >>>>>>>>>>> you said that Romanians skinned their babies alive I'd   
   >>>>>>>>>>> have the same   
   >>>>>>>>>>> reaction. I don't care if it's about Tibetans or people   
   >>>>>>>>>>> from Chicago.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> I'm not a fan of malicious propaganda.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so presumeably you must have copious evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the Lotus Sutra   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is "largely based on supernaturalism and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not on the assiduous practice and study of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buddhism.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> When I get a chance I may do that. Meanwhile, if you   
   >>>>>>>>>>> think that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> whole setup of the Lotus Sutra, asserting the unending   
   >>>>>>>>>>> lineage of   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, most of them never heard of   
   >>>>>>>>>>> in   
   >>>>>>>>>>> any other   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Theravadin or Mahayana record before or after, speaking   
   >>>>>>>>>>> of their occult,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> magical and supernatural doings, and how the sutra   
   >>>>>>>>>>> itself   
   >>>>>>>>>>> has myriad   
   >>>>>>>>>>> magical powers, shifting the emphasis from personal   
   >>>>>>>>>>> enlightenment   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|