XPost: talk.religion.buddhism, alt.zen, alt.philosophy.zen   
   XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy   
   From: evelyn.ruut@gmail.com   
      
   "halfawake" wrote in message   
   news:i4c3br$huf$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   > Evelyn wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> "halfawake" wrote in message   
   >> news:i4afcv$cf5$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>   
   >>> Evelyn wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Julian" wrote in message   
   >>>> news:i48e8n$7ev$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 15/08/2010 03:14, halfawake wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 14/08/2010 13:47, possum wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Julian" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:i45tgh$787$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 14/08/2010 11:53, possum wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> "Julian" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>> news:i45nhs$kqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 14/08/2010 09:14, halfawake wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2010 18:21, DT wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evelyn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "DT" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:i418a202llk@news3.newsguy.com...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evelyn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Julian" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:i40qsf$hbn$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2010 13:10, Jigme Dorje wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 12, 5:18 am,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2010 08:18, halfawake wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/08/2010 11:39, Catawumpus wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> halfawake:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fake conversation is between you and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ass. Hope   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're having a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fake conversation is the one Evelyn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> admitted to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when she denied she was offering a real one.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which makes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect sense in light of all the fake   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accusations she's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tossed.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are not fake. They are real accusations   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsubstantiated.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't expect anything else after the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Occultists, and the so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Korean Zen" and Tibetanista teachers, have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> profoundly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twisted her   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melon,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> man.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you really want to get occult, try the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assertions of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lotus Sutra,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> largely based on supernaturalism and magical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are keen and verbose in seeking evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> respect to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tibetan foetid rascalities before you'll cease   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deny such   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, proving a negative was never my strong suit, since   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> it is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> impossible. One doesn't take assertions that have no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> evidence and find   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> evidence to refute it. I challenge you to find evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> that there is n   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> such thing as a unicorn. Prove it. You can't. If you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> assert that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Tibetan lamas have done something you have to provide   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> evidence, and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> it has to be real evidence or it is pure bullshit. That   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> won't stop you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> from saying it is true over and over again will it?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Asserting things to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> exist that have no evidence is a strength of yours and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> other   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> anti-Tibetan ideologues. You find a book with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> unsubstantiated assertions   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and use it as a citation, or a picture that is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> supposedly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> of skin taken   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> from living people with no evidence to support it and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> then go on about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> it as if it were proven. And that is the worst kind of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda. If   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> you said that Romanians skinned their babies alive I'd   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> have the same   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> reaction. I don't care if it's about Tibetans or people   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> from Chicago.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not a fan of malicious propaganda.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so presumeably you must have copious evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the Lotus Sutra   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is "largely based on supernaturalism and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not on the assiduous practice and study of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buddhism.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> When I get a chance I may do that. Meanwhile, if you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> think that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> whole setup of the Lotus Sutra, asserting the unending   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> lineage of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, most of them never heard of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> any other   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|