XPost: talk.religion.buddhism, alt.zen, alt.philosophy.zen   
   XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy   
   From: epsteinrob@yahoo.com   
      
   Nobody in Particular wrote:   
      
   > Julian wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >>On 16/08/2010 05:28, halfawake wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>Julian wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>On 15/08/2010 03:14, halfawake wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On 14/08/2010 13:47, possum wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>"Julian" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>news:i45tgh$787$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>On 14/08/2010 11:53, possum wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>"Julian" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>news:i45nhs$kqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>On 14/08/2010 09:14, halfawake wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>On 12/08/2010 18:21, DT wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Evelyn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>"DT" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:i418a202llk@news3.newsguy.com...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Evelyn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Julian" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:i40qsf$hbn$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 12/08/2010 13:10, Jigme Dorje wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Aug 12, 5:18 am,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Julian   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 12/08/2010 08:18, halfawake wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 11/08/2010 11:39, Catawumpus wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>halfawake:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The fake conversation is between you and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ass. Hope   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you're having a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The fake conversation is the one Evelyn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>openly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>admitted to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>when she denied she was offering a real one.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Which makes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>perfect sense in light of all the fake   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>accusations she's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tossed.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are not fake. They are real accusations   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>but   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>unsubstantiated.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can't expect anything else after the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Occultists, and the so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Korean Zen" and Tibetanista teachers, have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>profoundly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>twisted her   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>melon,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>man.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you really want to get occult, try the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>assertions of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Lotus Sutra,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>largely based on supernaturalism and magical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>thinking   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You are keen and verbose in seeking evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>respect to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tibetan foetid rascalities before you'll cease   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deny such   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Yes, proving a negative was never my strong suit, since   
   >>>>>>>>>>>it is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>impossible. One doesn't take assertions that have no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>evidence and find   
   >>>>>>>>>>>evidence to refute it. I challenge you to find evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>that there is n   
   >>>>>>>>>>>such thing as a unicorn. Prove it. You can't. If you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>assert that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Tibetan lamas have done something you have to provide   
   >>>>>>>>>>>the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>evidence, and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>it has to be real evidence or it is pure bullshit. That   
   >>>>>>>>>>>won't stop you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>from saying it is true over and over again will it?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Asserting things to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>exist that have no evidence is a strength of yours and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>other   
   >>>>>>>>>>>anti-Tibetan ideologues. You find a book with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>unsubstantiated assertions   
   >>>>>>>>>>>and use it as a citation, or a picture that is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>supposedly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>of skin taken   
   >>>>>>>>>>>from living people with no evidence to support it and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>then go on about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>it as if it were proven. And that is the worst kind of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>propaganda. If   
   >>>>>>>>>>>you said that Romanians skinned their babies alive I'd   
   >>>>>>>>>>>have the same   
   >>>>>>>>>>>reaction. I don't care if it's about Tibetans or people   
   >>>>>>>>>>>from Chicago.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>I'm not a fan of malicious propaganda.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so presumeably you must have copious evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that the Lotus Sutra   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is "largely based on supernaturalism and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>magical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>thinking"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and not on the assiduous practice and study of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Buddhism.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Please share it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>When I get a chance I may do that. Meanwhile, if you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>think that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>whole setup of the Lotus Sutra, asserting the unending   
   >>>>>>>>>>>lineage of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, most of them never heard of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>any other   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Theravadin or Mahayana record before or after, speaking   
   >>>>>>>>>>>of their occult,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>magical and supernatural doings, and how the sutra   
   >>>>>>>>>>>itself   
   >>>>>>>>>>>has myriad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>magical powers, shifting the emphasis from personal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>enlightenment   
   >>>>>>>>>>>through understanding to the magical thinking of being   
   >>>>>>>>>>>graced with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>enlightenment by the mystical power of the sutra   
   >>>>>>>>>>>itself,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>is not an   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|