XPost: talk.religion.buddhism, alt.zen, alt.philosophy.zen   
   XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy   
   From: niunian@ymail.com   
      
   On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:46:25 +0000 (UTC), Lee Rudolph   
    wrote:   
      
   >Keynes  writes:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:03:18 -0700 (PDT), zenworm  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Aug 18, 7:16??pm, Catawumpus  wrote:   
   >>>> zenworm :   
   >>>>   
   >>>> > As we have seen with Catawumpus,   
   >>>> > having some success in defending 'a position'   
   >>>> > does not necessarily indicate that 'a position'   
   >>>> > has merit.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ?? ?? ??Zenworm demonstrates   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>the lack of merit in holding to views   
   >>>   
   >>>^~   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> that his lack of success in defending   
   >>>> the crap he's said on various subjects -- natural evil, the   
   >>>> Book of Genesis, the Four Noble Truths -- results in   
   >>>> additional meritless nattering like the above.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> -- Catawumpus   
   >>   
   >>Let's all chip in and buy Cat a thesaurus.   
   >>Can't get rid of him, but maybe we can get rid of 'nattering'.   
   >   
   >Nattering nabobs of nunianism!   
   >   
   >Lee Rudolph (you can give a gnat a ring, but you can't make it   
   >marry you)   
      
   It just happens we have similar understandings about Buddhism.   
      
   Catawumpus has far greater understanding about the Bible than anyone   
   else including myself in my opinion.   
      
   A true dharma defender if you ask me.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)