XPost: talk.religion.buddhism, alt.zen, alt.philosophy.zen   
   XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy   
   From: evelyn.ruut@gmail.com   
      
   "sleeper" wrote in message   
   news:oNSdnbXZxM5Yy-vRnZ2dnVY3goSdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   > On 26/08/2010 7:50 PM, Awaken21 wrote:   
   >> On Aug 26, 6:34 am, Julian wrote:   
   >>> On 26/08/2010 04:34, DharmaTroll wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Aug 23, 12:41 pm, halfawake wrote:   
   >>>>> Bodhidumba wrote:   
   >>>>>> Clearly, the Buddha wasn't kidding around when he declared that life   
   >>>>>> [samsara] is dukkha / unsatisfactory / suffering. Yes, there are   
   >>>>>> those who   
   >>>>>> say that "...if Nirvana comes, fine, if Samsara comes, fine..." but   
   >>>>>> it's   
   >>>>>> obvious from the above that the Buddha was not one of them, that's   
   >>>>>> for sure.   
   >>>>>> So, ultimately speaking, going by the above -- to the Buddha the only   
   >>>>>> thing   
   >>>>>> that *really* is 'fine' is Parinirvana, the "ultimate goal of   
   >>>>>> Buddhist   
   >>>>>> practice" - within reach only upon the death of the body of a   
   >>>>>> completely   
   >>>>>> awakened one -- the release from samsara / rebirth / karma.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> There is no doubt that the Buddha was not in favor of continued   
   >>>>> rebirth,   
   >>>>> and that the end of continued rebirth was a final destination of the   
   >>>>> Buddhist path. If we can just check that box, there may be some   
   >>>>> possibility of establishing some other points.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> What you cessationists [annihilationists/nihilists] fail to   
   >>>>> acknowledge   
   >>>>> is that there are two [count 'em two] aspects to the path: there is   
   >>>>> what you keep harping on - the accomplishment of the stages of   
   >>>>> arahatship which culminates in parinibbana/parinirvana, which   
   >>>>> represents   
   >>>>> the stepwise systematic accomplishment of the final goal of the path;   
   >>>>> and there is the path itself, the holy life as Buddha called it, and   
   >>>>> the   
   >>>>> principles one develops and practices while alive.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> This second aspect of the path is the actual path. You don't get to   
   >>>>> parinibbana by following the path "by the numbers" but by embodying   
   >>>>> the   
   >>>>> principles of the Noble Eight-fold Path according to your own   
   >>>>> accumulated tendencies and temperament. Buddha laid out a number of   
   >>>>> sub-paths to follow for people in different situations. There is the   
   >>>>> straight-and-narrow path of almost total self-abnegation and seclusion   
   >>>>> from life for those who have the propensity and desire in this   
   >>>>> lifetime   
   >>>>> to live as a monk; there is the more complex, rich and varied yet   
   >>>>> ultimately equally effective life of the householder, who happily   
   >>>>> engages in life as a Buddhist practitioner within the community of men   
   >>>>> and women, families and institutions and takes his or her place there   
   >>>>> while following a less stringent set of precepts; and there is the   
   >>>>> self-selected practitioner who takes a particular aspect of the path   
   >>>>> that fits for them, and follows it consistently until it leads to   
   >>>>> other   
   >>>>> good effects, such as meditation, good works/metta, or ritual   
   >>>>> involvement with the sangha. No matter which of these paths you   
   >>>>> take,   
   >>>>> it will take 99% of people a myriad number of lifetimes according to   
   >>>>> Buddha to get anywhere near parinibbana. So what do you do in the   
   >>>>> meantime? How do you conduct yourself through the many lifetimes of   
   >>>>> practice?   
   >>>   
   >>>>> It is within this practice context of real life for real practitioners   
   >>>>> that Tang's dictate makes sense. Do you *cling* to your image of   
   >>>>> nibbana   
   >>>>> and try to force your way into it? What you will wind up with is a   
   >>>>> forced samadhi based on suppression of the defilements, and you can   
   >>>>> stay   
   >>>>> that way, perhaps thinking you are in or close to nirvana, for many   
   >>>>> lifetimes, with thought cut off by suppression instead of attainment,   
   >>>>> filled with spiritual pride like niunian, or defeating people through   
   >>>>> forceful logic like a pompous and bombastic fool like Catawampus.   
   >>>>> Someone who does not focus on their own "knots" and tendencies and   
   >>>>> work   
   >>>>> with themselves devotedly and patiently is not going to get anywhere   
   >>>>> near nirvana, even in a dream as the zen masters like to say.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> When you continue to work with awareness and grow mindfulness, slow   
   >>>>> down   
   >>>>> and still the mind gradually and pay attention to what arises with   
   >>>>> equanimity, then you can actually do the work of the path. It may   
   >>>>> take   
   >>>>> a really long time. During this really long process filled with   
   >>>>> occasional insights, growing of awareness, etc., Tang's advice is   
   >>>>> extremely important. If samsara comes, you deal with it; if nirvana   
   >>>>> comes - or what appears to be nirvana - you don't attach to it. Deal   
   >>>>> with what seems *not* what you want; let go and move on from that   
   >>>>> which   
   >>>>> *is* what you want. Only by following this Tangian principal   
   >>>>> consistently can you get anywhere that is real.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> For those who are thrilled with their current enlightenment, they   
   >>>>> might   
   >>>>> remember that initial enlightenment and many of the stages of   
   >>>>> deepening   
   >>>>> after that are just stepping stones on the path from the point of view   
   >>>>> of the enlightened mastes. You *still* have to let go and move on and   
   >>>>> continue to cultivate to gain complete, unexcelled, unimpinged   
   >>>>> enlightened awareness. This is repeated over and over again by the   
   >>>>> zen   
   >>>>> masters. Hui Neng had his very deep initial enlightenment experience   
   >>>>> hearing a statement from the Diamond Sutra. But he then needed to   
   >>>>> shuck   
   >>>>> rice for 6 months to have his "full" enlightenment under the direction   
   >>>>> of the master. And even after that he needed 12 years in the forest   
   >>>>> allowing his enlightenment to riped before he was ready to take his   
   >>>>> place in the world as a teacher. Chao Chou waited until he was in his   
   >>>>> 80s to start teaching. Even the greatest of the masters need a *lot*   
   >>>>> of   
   >>>>> ripening to correctly cultivate their realization. Those who are   
   >>>>> running around getting off on kensho and thinking they have nothing to   
   >>>>> worry about are in danger of developing "enlightened ego" and as some   
   >>>>> around here have displayed, there's nothing worse in the universe.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> On the other hand, those who follow the Theravadin path through   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|