XPost: talk.religion.buddhism, alt.zen, alt.philosophy.zen   
   XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy   
   From: Julianlzb87@gmail.com   
      
   On 28/08/2010 17:53, sleeper wrote:   
   > On 29/08/2010 12:50 AM, Julian wrote:   
   >> On 28/08/2010 17:25, sleeper wrote:   
   >>> On 29/08/2010 12:21 AM, sleeper wrote:   
   >>>> On 28/08/2010 9:31 PM, Jigme Dorje wrote:   
   >>>>> On Aug 28, 5:33 am, sleeper wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 28/08/2010 5:31 PM, sleeper wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 28/08/2010 10:04 AM, Jigme Dorje wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 6:42 am, sleeper wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 27/08/2010 6:35 PM, Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 27/08/2010 10:58, sleeper wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 27/08/2010 4:45 PM, Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 27/08/2010 01:57, Awaken21 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 26, 7:57 am, sleeper wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/08/2010 7:50 PM, Awaken21 wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 26, 6:34 am, Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/08/2010 04:34, DharmaTroll wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 23, 12:41 pm, halfawake   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bodhidumba wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clearly, the Buddha wasn't kidding around when he   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> declared   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [samsara] is dukkha / unsatisfactory / suffering. Yes,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those who   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say that "...if Nirvana comes, fine, if Samsara comes,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine..."   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obvious from the above that the Buddha was not one of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's for sure.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, ultimately speaking, going by the above -- to the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buddha the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only thing   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that *really* is 'fine' is Parinirvana, the "ultimate   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buddhist   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> practice" - within reach only upon the death of the body   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completely   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awakened one -- the release from samsara / rebirth /   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> karma.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no doubt that the Buddha was not in favor of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continued   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebirth,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that the end of continued rebirth was a final   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destination of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buddhist path. If we can just check that box, there may   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be some   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibility of establishing some other points.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What you cessationists [annihilationists/nihilists]   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledge   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that there are two [count 'em two] aspects to the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what you keep harping on - the accomplishment of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stages of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arahatship which culminates in parinibbana/parinirvana,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> represents   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the stepwise systematic accomplishment of the final goal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path;   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and there is the path itself, the holy life as Buddha   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> principles one develops and practices while alive.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This second aspect of the path is the actual path. You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parinibbana by following the path "by the numbers" but by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embodying the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> principles of the Noble Eight-fold Path according to your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated tendencies and temperament. Buddha laid out a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sub-paths to follow for people in different situations.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straight-and-narrow path of almost total self-abnegation   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seclusion   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from life for those who have the propensity and desire in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lifetime   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to live as a monk; there is the more complex, rich and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> varied yet   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ultimately equally effective life of the householder, who   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happily   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engages in life as a Buddhist practitioner within the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of men   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and women, families and institutions and takes his or her   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while following a less stringent set of precepts; and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-selected practitioner who takes a particular aspect   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that fits for them, and follows it consistently until it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leads to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good effects, such as meditation, good works/metta, or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ritual   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> involvement with the sangha. No matter which of these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paths you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it will take 99% of people a myriad number of lifetimes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buddha to get anywhere near parinibbana. So what do   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you do   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meantime? How do you conduct yourself through the many   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lifetimes of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> practice?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is within this practice context of real life for real   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> practitioners   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Tang's dictate makes sense. Do you *cling* to your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> image of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nibbana   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and try to force your way into it? What you will wind up   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with is a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forced samadhi based on suppression of the defilements,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that way, perhaps thinking you are in or close to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nirvana, for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lifetimes, with thought cut off by suppression instead of   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|