XPost: talk.religion.buddhism, alt.zen, alt.philosophy.zen   
   XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy   
   From: epsteinrob@yahoo.com   
      
   Catawumpus wrote:   
      
   > halfawake :   
   >   
   >   
   >>Thus you go backwards and ignore the point being made.  You know   
   >   
   >   
   >      I know you're dodging the point, namely that your idea the   
   > enlightened have gone beyond suffering conflicts with the   
   > Sakalika Sutta, which implies the Buddha suffered from the pain   
   > caused him by a shard of rock.   
   >   
   > -- Catawumpus   
      
   I made some specific points which you refuse to acknowledge or deal   
   with.  That's the way you handle all of these topics. It's a boring and   
   underhanded way to debate, to make believe the other person hasn't said   
   anything new, but has merely contradicted your original restricted frame   
   of reference which you deem the only correct one.  You make yourself   
   appear to have some competence by doggedly sticking to one or two points   
   that you can defend and never deigning to actually discuss what the   
   other person says.  Go off and mentally masturbate, which is all you're   
   capable of doing or enjoying.  Then you can congratulate yourself on the   
   power of your one-dimensional ideas.   
      
   Robert   
      
   = = = = =   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)