Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.buddhism    |    Buddhism followers and admirers    |    11,893 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,888 of 11,893    |
|    Peter Terpstra to All    |
|    Not-Knowing    |
|    21 Sep 12 11:26:22    |
      XPost: alt.religion.buddhism.tibetan, alt.zen       From: peter@dharma.dyndns.info                      Not-Knowing              adapted from a talk by Gil Fronsdal, February 10th, 2004              Buddhist practice involves an interplay between knowing and not-knowing.       In Vipassana we often emphasize knowing and seeing deeply into our lived       experience. However, just as our capacity to know can be developed, so       can we cultivate a wise practice of not-knowing.              “Not-knowing” is emphasized in Zen practice, where it is sometimes       called “beginner’s mind.” An expert may know a subject deeply, yet be       blinded to new possibilities by his or her preconceived ideas. In       contrast, a beginner may see with fresh, unbiased eyes. The practice of       beginner’s mind is to cultivate an ability to meet life without       preconceived ideas, interpretations, or judgments.              I can recall many situations in my life where preconceived ideas       obscured my seeing clearly. Once, working as a restaurant cook, I was       leaving my shift just as a co-worker started his. When I began joking       with him as usual, he quickly interrupted me to say that one of his best       friends had just died. If I had practiced beginner’s mind, I would have       taken the time to discover who he was at that moment. Instead, I felt       regret for being insensitive.              I once attended a weekend “Death and Dying” workshop with Stephen       Levine. When the workshop started I was stunned by the amount of       suffering in the room. Some were dying. Others had recently lost a       child, a partner, or a parent. Some had witnessed tragic deaths. One had       nearly died herself. The weekend taught me to not to assume I know       people from my first impressions. Now I try to remember that they have       depths that I might not know about.              This experience points out another kind of not-knowing as well. How       would you live your life if you had a clear sense of the uncertainty of       the time and place of death-your own and others’? Most people don’t know       when death will come. We often live as if we were certain about things       that are inherently uncertain. How would we live if we acknowledged our       uncertainty?              What is it like to be aware that we don’t know the answers to some of       the life’s big questions? People often ask Buddhist teachers about what       happens when we die, or the meaning of life. I have been inspired by       those who answer that they don’t know, and seem very comfortable with       not-knowing. Perhaps these questions are irrelevant to their spiritual life.              Often people are anxious to find the ultimate meaning of life or       understand what happens in death because they are afraid of the unknown.       They may look to religion for answers. Buddhism, at its heart, is not       about answering these questions but about resolving the fear that       motivates the questions. Rather than providing security through       religious knowing, Buddhist practice calls on us to become free from       attachment to security, free from the need to know.              A simple but profound way to practice not-knowing is to add “I don’t       know” to every thought. This is most effective in meditation when the       mind has quieted down. So, for example, if the judgment arises, “This is       a good meditation session” or “this is a bad meditation session,”       respond with “I don’t know.” Follow the thought “I can’t manage this,”       “I need…,” or “I am…” with “I don’t know.” Like the bumper sticker that       says “Question authority,” the phrase “I don’t know” questions the       authority of everything we think.              Repeating the words “I don’t know” allows us to question tightly-held       ideas. Done thoroughly, “I don’t know” can pull the rug out from under       our most cherished beliefs. All too often we don’t question our beliefs.       And, since virtually every train of thought has some implicit belief,       when we question our thoughts, we question these beliefs.              “Don’t know” can also be directed at motivations that lead us to act.       Before adjusting your posture in meditation or quitting walking       meditation early, notice what belief is operating in the motivation.       Then direct “don’t know” to that belief and see what happens.              When I was kitchen manager in a monastery, I saw how much I was driven       by the need to be liked. The way I talked and behaved with the crew was       often influenced by this desire. To ensure that what I did or said did       not trigger their reactivity and dislike, I felt I had to tiptoe around       their (and my) egos. But during that year I began to question my need to       be liked. Upon what authority was I basing this need? Did I really know       if it was important to have people like me? Don’t know.              Don’t know. Don’t know. Repeated regularly, it almost becomes a mantra       in response to what we think or believe. This phrase can open up a space       in the mind, helping it to relax and rest. The little phrase, “I don’t       know,” is very, very powerful.              One Zen story proclaims, “Not knowing is most intimate.” I understand       this to mean that what is most essential is not understood through the       filter of our judgments, past knowledge, or memories. When not-knowing       helps these to drop away, the result can be a greater immediacy-what       some might call being intimate.              The practice of not-knowing needs to be distinguished from confusion and       debilitating doubt. Confusion is not a virtue: the confused person is       somewhat lost and removed from life. With doubt, the mind is agitated or       contracted with hesitation and indecision. These mind states tend to       obscure rather than clarify. Furthermore, confusion and doubt are       generally involuntary. Not-knowing, as a practice, is a choice meant to       bring greater peace.              But lest we take the not-knowing practice too far, Suzuki Roshi said,       “Not-knowing does not mean you don’t know.” It doesn’t require us to       forget everything we have known or to suspend all interpretations of a       situation. Not-knowing means not being limited by what we know, holding       what we know lightly so that we are ready for it to be different. Maybe       things are this way. But maybe they are not.              As a Buddhist practice, not-knowing leads to more than an intimacy and       open mind. It can be used as a sword to cut through all the ways that       the mind clings. If we can wield this sword until the mind lets go of       itself and finally knows ultimate freedom, then-not knowing has served       its ultimate purpose.              http://www.insightmeditationcenter.org/books-articles/articles/not-knowing/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca