XPost: alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.religion.scientology, rec.music.reggae   
   XPost: alt.music.the-doors   
   From: abc@def.com   
      
   "Dale"  wrote in message   
   news:79p09p.ai1.17.5@news.alt.net...   
   > There should be studies of WHY people adhere to religion.   
   >   
   > There should be studies of what psychological, psychiatrical, and   
   > sociological suggestions are in religion.   
   >   
   > Science is always complaining about religion not recognizing its   
   > advancements, but science must consider very old traditions have something   
   > to offer too, or else they wouldn't be adhered to for so long   
   >   
   > Science didn't start with Galileo, Descartes, Newton, etc.   
   >   
   > People have been asking questions and seeking answers and developing   
   > solutions based on such since the dawn of man.   
   >   
   > Science should compare its delivery system of knowledge to the public, as   
   > opposed to the religious delivery system. Lots of science does not make it   
   > past the insider peer review process thinking that the average man is not   
   > capable of understanding it. Religion has a good system of explaining   
   > things to the public, even if it is in parables or metaphors. Maybe   
   > schools should incorporate the parable/metaphor model for early   
   > development. Can you really say our public schools deliver a satisfactory   
   > education of psychology, psychiatry, or sociology?   
      
   Religion has nothing to do with psychology, psychiatry, or sociology, but   
   these studies can illustrate and document the EVILS that religion does and   
   has done to the human race for thousands of years.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)