XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.christian.religion, alt.christ   
   et.christianlife   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,   
   alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.buddhism, alt.religiontaoism, alt.current-affairs.muslim   
   From: no@spam.org   
      
   On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 23:27:39 -0700, Bud Dickman  wrote:   
      
   >On 7/26/2018 11:23 PM, Dutch wrote:   
   >> On 7/26/2018 12:01 PM, Bud Dickman wrote:   
      
   >>> It's not.  The woman might not like that she's pregnant, but that does   
   >>> not give her the right to murder the developing baby.   
   >>>   
   >>> A better analogy is with with trespassers or squatters.  Such persons   
   >>> are using your property "against your will", but you may not murder   
   >>> them to regain control of your property.   
   >>   
   >> A being growing inside your body is hardly equivalent to somebody   
   >> camping in your back forty.   
   >   
   >They are fully equivalent.  Both are using something you view as your   
   >"property", and you don't like it.  What you may legally and ethically   
   >do to put a stop to the trespass is not entirely up to you.   
      
   	Is there such a thing as the right to exist within the   
   confines of another being itself has rights?   
      
   Don   
   aa#51, Knight of BAAWA, Jedi Slackmaster   
   Praise "Bob" or burn in Slacklessness trying not to.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)