XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.christian.religion, alt.christ   
   et.christianlife   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,   
   alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.buddhism, alt.religion.taoism, alt.current-affairs.muslim   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 10/27/20 6:39 PM, Dutch wrote:   
   > On 2020-10-27 8:45 a.m., BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   >> On 10/27/20 4:00 AM, Dutch wrote:   
   >>> On 2020-10-26 1:13 p.m., BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   >>>> On 10/26/20 3:12 PM, Dutch wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2020-10-26 7:29 a.m., BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Some human lives are worthwhile, yours seems like a big waste.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The HATE is strong in this one.... may the HATE be with you.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It's hard not to hate what humans have done to this beautiful planet.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Asteroids and Gama Ray Bursts and ice ages and other things will do   
   >>>> worse.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> it's NOT really logical to hate a non entity that is just adhering   
   >>>> to the laws of the universe.   
   >>>   
   >>> I didn't say I hated asteroids.   
   >>   
   >> Are you stupid or something? I didn't say you did I said hating   
   >> humanity is like hating an asteroid which is just an entity a thing   
   >> that exists according the the physical laws of the universe and all   
   >> could do similar damage .   
   >>   
   >> I said hating humanity and you clearly do hate humanity, is not   
   >> logical unless you also hate other things like an asteroid that will   
   >> result in the same kind of damage of extinctions and deaths and   
   >> destruction of life as it was 10,000 years ago.   
   >   
   > So humans causing death and destruction is the equivalent of a natural   
   > disaster? What a brain-dead idea.   
   >   
      
   What was the Chinese Communist Party Virus, it was released by the (CCP)   
   are you calling it a man made disaster that was above and beyond NATURE   
   and the cause needs to be tracked down and the perpetrators killed by   
   the CIA?   
      
   Or should we look at it as a celestial event where the universe lined up   
   and we worked with the hand we were dealt?   
      
   >> You do know that even a super volcano could create atmospheric changes   
   >> and little ice ages and deserts and areas that are lifeless and spew   
   >> toxins (or at least what you think of as toxins).  SO since you're   
   >> basing this on your opinions, it's all in your head and it's NOT reality   
   >> because in reality the universe could do worse to the planet on any   
   >> given day so every day is a chance for the universe to make humanity   
   >> look like a bothersome gnat as the universe wipes out part or all of   
   >> the planets "charms" that you seem to think have more of a place here   
   >> than humanity.   
   >   
   > That was an incomprehensible word salad.   
      
   Good for you, enjoy the salad.   
   >   
   >> I'm suspecting that something is broken in your mind and you need to   
   >> look for some kind of psychological help.   
   >   
   > I suspect that you are beyond help.   
      
   I'm NOT the one who hates humanity and human life in the uterus.   
      
   I think we need to prioritize the help and you seem to need it much more   
   than I.   
      
   >   
   >>> Your logic is like saying that I shouldn't hate violent pedophiles   
   >>> who only kill a few children when there are others who kill lots.   
   >>>   
   >>> Another thing, you're against abortion right? Well, nature flushes   
   >>> fertilized eggs all the time. It's not logical to hate nature.   
   >>   
   >> Again The LAWS OF THE Universe limit the actions and I didn't claim   
   >> that GOD or the laws of physics doesn't allow abortion, it's simple a   
   >> respect for human life. We accept that human life has RIGHTS called   
   >> inalienable RIGHTS and that in order for humans, when there are more   
   >> than two and since it takes two for there to be a species, that when   
   >> two humans are present IN THE UNITED STATES that they have inalienable   
   >> RIGHTS.... among those are the RIGHT to LIFE LIBERTY and the RIGHT to   
   >> property, so the largest can't just kill and steal and makes slaves of   
   >> the weaker.   
   >>   
   >> You seem to have a problem with the scientifically accepted point when   
   >> human life begins.  It begins when the science tells us it begins, and   
   >> that seems to be when the DNA combines to form the complete DNA of a   
   >> unique human life.   
   >   
   > Where did you get the idea that I don't know that?   
      
   I said you don't seem to "accept" that science.  That or you can't   
   accept the social norms of humanity.   
      
   If you choose to accept abortion then the next question is what happens   
   when someone else demands that women abort their babies.   
      
   If you established that it's OK to abort a human life then why would you   
   be opposed to someone forcing someone else to abort a human life... if   
   the human life has no RIGHTS and no why NOT just remove the RIGHTS of   
   the woman, it's just as easy then force the woman to abort as to allow a   
   woman to abort and in many cases it may be declared a public health   
   mandate.  And if the woman refuses then it may be deemed legal and in   
   PUBLIC SAFETY to execute the woman and the baby. Why is the woman any   
   more valuable than the human life in her uterus?   
      
      
   > What is not settled   
   > is when a human life becomes a person with the full protection of the   
   > state.   
      
      
   And there we have the question, we know what and when HUMAN LIFE is.   
      
   What we don't know is why Democrats ignore it.   
      
      
   >> Will that include man made clones, that will be for science to tackle   
   >> but they appear to be human (homosapiens) and alive.   
   >   
   > What about frozen embryos? What about the fertilized eggs flushed out in   
   > a woman's monthly cycle, should the state intervene to protect them?   
      
   Again you confuse man made with nature...  just because nature does   
   something doesn't we need to do it.   
      
   We can respect human life, or NOT.   
   You choose to NOT respect it.  I never said you're forced by nature to   
   respect human life, Free will and all that.  But society can either   
   protect life or society will collapse, and the universe will continue to   
   exist.  But you might NOT.   
      
      
   --   
   That's Karma   
      
      
                         *Mama'says*   
   57 - Liberal employees call hemorrhoids a workplace injury.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)