home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.religion.jewish      Jackie Mason nailed it on the Simpsons      406 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 343 of 406   
   BeamMeUpScotty to Rudy Canoza   
   Re: Florida Anti-Riot Law 'Violates the    
   18 Sep 21 10:52:15   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.christian.religion, alt.christ   
   et.christianlife   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,   
   alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.buddhism, alt.religion.taoism, alt.current-affairs.muslim   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.economics, talk.politics.usa.constitution   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.trump, alt.po   
   itics.economics   
   XPost: alt.philosophy, alt.politics.constitution, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 9/18/21 1:16 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   > The law's "vagueness permits those in power to weaponize its enforcement   
   > against any group who wishes to express any message that the government   
   > disapproves of," Judge Mark Eaton Walker warns.   
   >   
   > ELIZABETH NOLAN BROWN | 9.17.2021 1:35 PM   
   >   
   > Enforcement of Florida's "Combating Public Disorder Act" has been   
   > partially blocked by a federal judge, who appeared to agree with those   
   > challenging the "anti-riot" law that it was unfairly targeted at black   
   > Floridians and people protesting racial injustice.   
   >   
   > Challengers to the law argued that it had a chilling effect on free   
   > speech and protest in the state.   
   >   
   > https://reason.com/2021/09/17/florida-anti-riot-law-violates-t   
   e-first-amendment-says-court-in-scathing-rebuke-of-gov-ron-desantis/   
   >   
   >   
   > The challengers of the bad law are correct, of course.   
      
      
   That makes no sense... where in the Constitution does it say that   
   RIOTING is a first amendment RIGHT?   
      
   It says you have a RIGHT to petition the government which has been   
   *defined by the courts as protesting* NOT rioting.   
      
   You have no RIGHT to riot.   
      
   You have no right to join a mob and stop people and beat them and maim   
   them for life, or kill them.   
      
   *If you try to stop them then you have initiated the interaction* and   
   attempted to violate the drivers right to freedom of movement and you're   
   preventing the driver from their right to travel where they intended   
   which is kidnapping and a felony... and when you're being kidnapped you   
   can use lethal force to escape.   
      
   The courts are losing credibility every day and the Supreme Court allows   
   these ridiculous ruling so it's the fault of the Supreme Court that they   
   have as little credibility as Biden and the Democrats.   
      
   *Democrat Policy is unsustainable, self destructive and contradicting*   
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   That's karma   
      
      
   Censorship is a systemic form of violence, using force to silence those   
   you hate.   
      
   Censorship is HATE personified... Hate groups use censorship to help   
   force those they hate to be gagged and silenced and canceled.   
      
   Censorship becomes a systemic hate crime and a form of SLAVERY when it's   
   illegally forced on American citizens. TWITTER'S censorship is enslaving   
   Blacks.   
      
   Censorship of this document in whole or part, is an admission of your   
   belonging to a VIOLENT HATE GROUP.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca