XPost: alt.politics.republicans, alt.college.republicans, alt.po   
   itics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.soc.women, alt.soc.men, alt.politics.corruption   
   XPost: alt.society.liberalism, or.politics, seattle.politics   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.abortion, alt.beam-me-up.scott   
   .there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here   
   XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,   
   alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.buddhism, alt.religion.taoism   
   XPost: alt.current-affairs.muslim   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 12/3/21 11:47 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   > On 12/3/2021 6:51 PM, AlleyCat bullshitted:   
   >>   
   >> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 23:04:51 -0000 (UTC),  R Kym Horsell says...   
   >>   
   >>> Wood sucks down CO2 from the atm. If you burn a 1 year old tree you   
   >>> are returning to the atm what was in the atm just a year ago.   
   >>   Uhh... no,   
   >   
   > Yes.   
   >   
   > You're full of shit, *Schild*.   
      
   If people need Oxygen and there is an unprecedented 7.5 BILLION people...?   
      
   and you only have so much Carbon Dioxide, where will all that Oxygen   
   that's needed for them and more, be coming from? Are you suggesting they   
   be exterminated for your plan to decrease the carbon Dioxide to be   
   viable, and isn't each human a bag of Carbon that comes from the plants   
   that got their carbon from the atmosphere? Since the humans don't   
   extract Carbon Dioxide from the air but do extract Oxygen and expel   
   Carbon Dioxide, again the need for more plants seems particularly and   
   increasingly apparent...  Maybe you GLOBAL WARMING FREAKS are actually   
   committing mass genocide with your plan to limit CO2 which will prevent   
   more plants and cause the increasing mass of humanity to NOT have enough   
   carbon to process CO2 INTO O2 and fro humans to consume to make little   
   Carbon Copies so humanity would die off.  In short a lack of carbon   
   would limit the population.  If you decrease Carbon Dioxide and plants   
   you limit the human population.   
      
   Don't you need more Carbon Dioxide to also be used by MORE plants to   
   expel more Oxygen for the more humans? It seems a simple question you   
   never ask or answer?  You need them all balanced, and the Global Warming   
   Myth is going to interfere with that.   
      
   Which means instead of cutting the Carbon Dioxide you should be trying   
   to increase the plant population to convert more of that *VERY VALUABLE*   
   Carbon Dioxide to Oxygen so the bulk of humanity isn't suffocating with   
   the low levels of Oxygen...   
      
   If the human expelled "CO2" isn't being converted to "O2" by plants any   
   more than the fossil fuel CO2, you'll see a rise in "CO2" won't you.  SO   
   it's NOT a case of denying the planet the CO2 which is already here, but   
   actually a case of converting that CO2 into O2 for the humans that are   
   already here.   
      
   The question is whether you're trying to kill off humanity or increase   
   plant life.... you seem to be choosing like Hitler did, to kill off   
   people that you don't think the planet needs.  How Hitler-esque of all   
   those GLOBAL WARMING ZEALOTS.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   That's karma,   
      
   Democrats attempt at mandated assimilation is futile, a successful   
   resistance is inevitable.   
      
      
   *We don't need to test for the WUHAN virus we need to test for a*   
   *suppressed immune system* and the people with immune system problems   
   need the VIRUS PASSPORTS, NOT the rest of us who are healthy. And it's   
   not just the elderly who have low functioning immune systems, also   
   people with HIV/AIDS and others, which may be why those groups have the   
   most issues with the virus and/or the FAKE vaccine.   
   https://www.brighteon.com/1a421368-d95b-4aa9-9c42-01a8c91ed41e   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)