Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.new    |    Sortof like the Flying Spaghetti Monster    |    684 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 127 of 684    |
|    Allan Svensson to All    |
|    Jesus is the Lord of the Mission    |
|    25 Nov 05 08:59:17    |
      From: allan-sv@algonet.se               Jesus is the Lord of the Mission        Matt.28:18-20                     To understand this article, you must observe that the churches are       not the Body of Christ. It is an essential difference between an       organization and a living organism. With "the Assembly of God"       I mean all true Christians, the Body o Christ. According to 1 Cor.       12:12-31. This is no church and no denomination. Please, read the       article "30. The Assembly of God".              There is scarcely any Christian activity today which has no special       name. Either are the Christians connected with a church or else have       they made special names for their activity, but in the Bible there       occur no such names. It is importantly that we do not place any other       name besides the name of the Lord when we speak about the work       of God. Exodus 20:3.              When the apostle Paul came to Corinth, then he did not come as a       representative of "The Apostolic Mission" or any such name. "For       I resolved to know nothing while I was with you except Jesus       Christ and him crucified." 1 Cor. 2:2. It was not "The Apostles       Pioneer Mission" that had sent him, but he was an envoy of       Jesus Christ. "Now then we are envoys for Christ, as though God       did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled       to God." 2 Cor. 5:20.              (In the English Bible they have written "ambassadors for Christ",       but it is not correct. This world has not acknowledge the kingdom       of God and there is no diplomatic connection between the world       and the kingdom of God. Accordingly, the apostles were no       ambassadors and they did not appear as ambassadors. For the       apostles and for all Christians this world is a hostile country and       we have no Christian embassy here. Anyone who chooses to be a       friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.       James 4:4).              Perhaps you think, but that was the apostles. But who has said that       we other Christians have right to use other names instead of the       Lord's name when we serve him? Shall we represent Jesus Christ       or anything other? The disruption of the Christians in many       different churches is in the reality caused of idolatry. They have       raised up other names besides the Lord's name when they really       ought to know nothing except Jesus Christ and him crucified.       Please, compare Genesis 11:4.              To reach the real Christian unity about which the Bible tells,       we all Christians must leave the churches and confess that we       belong to Jesus alone. For in him we have salvation and all       blessings of God. Eph. 1:3. For there is no other name under       heaven given to men by which we must be saved. Acts 4:12.       The Lord is perfect and his name does not need be completed       with any party labels.              It is a usual argument that we must have a name that separates       us from others. Then the question is, from which would we       become separated? The one name that we can accept as "separate-       name" is Jesus Christ. His name separates us from those who do       not belong to him. However, many use the Lord's name and mean       that they are Christians though they are not, but then they take       the Lord's name in vain. Though it is forbidden in law that anyone       takes the name of the Lord in vain, Exodus 20:7, there is no other       name that they so abuse as just the name of the Lord. The churches       have made all their evil deeds "in the name of God."              Concerning the Christian mission, it says that the missionaries       are sent out of churches and denominations. Nevertheless, if the       Christians had not been divided in several churches and       denominations, still more missionaries could have been sent out.       Then they had been able to preach a more biblical gospel, without       church traditions, and still more had been won for Christ. Then       the missionaries had been sent out, not of any church, but of a       united Body of Christ. The money swallowed by luxurious       church buildings could instead have been used to the mission.       The churches have been obstacles to the Christian mission and       shall not take any glory for what has been won through the       Christian mission.              Churches and denominations are against every tendency to       revival. When any members want to leave church they get the       question: Do you think leave the Christian fellowship? But       leaving church or a denomination is not the same as to leave       the Christian fellowship. Instead it is the churches and       denominations that have destroyed the Christian fellowship.       Those who are most eager to quote Hebr. 10:25 are those who       have abandoned the Christian fellowship for the church       fellowship. We must make a distinction between Christian       fellowship and church fellowship for it is not the same. The       church fellowship we can leave for it has no support in the       Bible.       "Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together: as the       manner of some is." Hebr. 10:25. On that time when this was       written some had this habit, but now the whole assembling of       the Christians has been destroyed. The Christians are now split       in several churches, denominations and religious sects. And the       boundary between the Body of Christ and the world is very       unclear. Believers and unbelievers belong to the same       denomination and go to the same church.              Denominations and churches do not demand conversion to the       Lord and baptism. The membership has nothing to do with       Christian faith. For the sake of ecumenicalism, also the       Pentecostal Movement has given up the demand of conversion       and baptism and can have alliance-meetings with other churches       and even with Catholics.              Allan Svensson              Do you want to read the continuation of this article       or if you have any questions       Please, visit my Web Site              http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/CONTENTS.HTM              (Article 32)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca