Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.new    |    Sortof like the Flying Spaghetti Monster    |    684 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 535 of 684    |
|    Soft Logic to All    |
|    Please excuse this spam    |
|    02 Mar 19 11:45:11    |
      From: hiding5693@gmail.com              Please excuse this spam              Why do racists sometimes seem to assume that those of the white race alone are       capable of creativity and that all new ideas must inevitably come from the       white race and the white race alone? The phrase “it was stolen from a white       god” might as such        be racially unfair when applied to new ideas that might be devised by anyone       who is not of the white race.              I believe that there might often be more than one way to convey any given       thought or idea. I do not as such believe in the objectively created one and       only perfect sentence, believing instead that most communication might be       somewhat subjective in nature        and that, as such, there might be several various wordings that might be able       to convey the same basic thought or idea.              I do not like witches or haters. I find the misuse of psychic ability to be       grotesquely wrong. Such a transgression might perhaps not always be so easy to       prove, but might not be impossible to prove as such either. I suggest that       witches who might be in        positions of authority, such as courtroom trial judges and such, might perhaps       be among the most oppressive kind.              I posit that simply being able to conceive of anything greater than God need       not mean that anything greater than God can ever actually exist. In certain       science fiction such a thing might be possible, but perhaps not so much in       reality.              It is perhaps often better that one sometimes be misunderstood in light of       using an “imperfectly” worded sentence to convey a thought than that       authority over the use of language become over-regulated and oppressively       fascist. In that sense, perhaps        the author of a written work should have at least a bit more rights than the       reader of such a work alone does when it comes down to interpreting that work.              I suggest that allowing for imperfection might sometimes be conducive to       better self-directed learning.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca