home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.religion.new      Sortof like the Flying Spaghetti Monster      684 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 535 of 684   
   Soft Logic to All   
   Please excuse this spam   
   02 Mar 19 11:45:11   
   
   From: hiding5693@gmail.com   
      
   Please excuse this spam   
      
   Why do racists sometimes seem to assume that those of the white race alone are   
   capable of creativity and that all new ideas must inevitably come from the   
   white race and the white race alone? The phrase “it was stolen from a white   
   god” might as such    
   be racially unfair when applied to new ideas that might be devised by anyone   
   who is not of the white race.   
      
   I believe that there might often be more than one way to convey any given   
   thought or idea. I do not as such believe in the objectively created one and   
   only perfect sentence, believing instead that most communication might be   
   somewhat subjective in nature    
   and that, as such, there might be several various wordings that might be able   
   to convey the same basic thought or idea.   
      
   I do not like witches or haters. I find the misuse of psychic ability to be   
   grotesquely wrong. Such a transgression might perhaps not always be so easy to   
   prove, but might not be impossible to prove as such either. I suggest that   
   witches who might be in    
   positions of authority, such as courtroom trial judges and such, might perhaps   
   be among the most oppressive kind.   
      
   I posit that simply being able to conceive of anything greater than God need   
   not mean that anything greater than God can ever actually exist. In certain   
   science fiction such a thing might be possible, but perhaps not so much in   
   reality.   
      
   It is perhaps often better that one sometimes be misunderstood in light of   
   using an “imperfectly” worded sentence to convey a thought than that   
   authority over the use of language become over-regulated and oppressively   
   fascist. In that sense, perhaps    
   the author of a written work should have at least a bit more rights than the   
   reader of such a work alone does when it comes down to interpreting that work.   
      
   I suggest that allowing for imperfection might sometimes be conducive to   
   better self-directed learning.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca