Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.roman-catholic    |    Jonah is the original Jaws story...    |    1,366 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,221 of 1,366    |
|    servant to All    |
|    Example - Ancient languages: more comple    |
|    31 Oct 19 17:22:31    |
      XPost: alt.bible, alt.christian.bible, alt.christian.religion       XPost: alt.christnet.bible, alt.christian              Friend james snaged, totally unquestioned, a small bit from ssome jw       publication, likely watchtower.              The bit in turn was repeating a bit from an author who said some written       older languages were more complex then newer versions of them.                     Friend james did not explain what that meant as to facts.       For example, modern french which derived from latin has fewer verb cases       then the latin which can then be said to be more complex.              Frind james did not understand what he posted. Jw said it, it must be       valid,no?              The jw bit did not explain if the 5 or so examples he listed represent all       4000 or so languages, not even among those with writing he might have       discussed but not mentioned in the jw bit.              Chinese of today is more complex then older forms; for example.              This is a too frequent jw tactic, it is just down right lying when it comes       down to it.              Jw publications like to lard themselves with the words of non-jw experts,       apparently in an attempt to add credability. Jw do not have such experts,       higher education is frowned upon and discouraged.              But far far too often those are cherry picked words which distort and       misrepresent the whole of the experts thoughts.              They even go to a more even dishonest level, they will leave out phrases       in the middle of sentences and other segments which refute the words the jw       are trying to push.              Here is a short example, on evolution interestingly; that demonstrates this       lying practice. I have others if people are interested.              Friend janes, go against the jw prohibition on reading what might       refute their propaganda and tell us yourr thoughts on this jw exampll       , just 3 web pages in my browser:              'Biology Professor Says Creationist Magazine Misquoted Him To Perpetuate Lies       Against Evolution':              https://www.inquisitr.com/1766536/biology-professor-creationist-magazine/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca