Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.roman-catholic    |    Jonah is the original Jaws story...    |    1,366 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 781 of 1,366    |
|    MarkA to All    |
|    OT: first trimester abortion    |
|    05 Mar 11 17:00:04    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, alt.abortion       From: someone@somewhere.com              I asked this of an anti-abortion/forced-birth/pro-life poster in another       thread, and never got a reply. I sincerely would like some input from       someone who believes that life starts at conception, and first/second       trimester fetuses have a "right to life".              A fertility clinic fertilizes an egg, and allows it to divide once. The       two daughter cells are separated, and one is frozen. The other is allowed       to continue dividing, and is eventually implanted into a woman's uterus,       where it grows to term, resulting in a healthy baby and happy parents.              So, what *is* the other cell? Is it a separate person, who has his/her       own "right to life"? Or, is it just a cell, discarded from the person who       has already been born, as we shed cells all the time?              If it is its own person, why wasn't it its own person if it weren't       separated? Are we all actually 100,000,000,000,000 separate people,       sharing the same body?              If it is not its own person, would it become a person if thawed, and       allowed to develop into a new fetus? That would imply that personhood is       something that comes with a certain degree of development, which the       pro-lifers deny.              --       MarkA              If you can read this, you can stop reading now.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca