XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.politics.liberalism, soc.culture.usa   
   XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: Vurgil@arg.erg   
      
   In article ,   
    Steve  wrote:   
      
   > On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:10:28 -0700, Vurgil  wrote:   
   >   
   > >In article <3b55l7tf5nkdn5nbub66321u7klsb9cjr0@4ax.com>,   
   > > Steve  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 18:31:47 +0000 (UTC), 2907 Dead    
   > >> wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> >On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:30:05 -0600, Dånk 42Ø wrote:   
   > >> >   
   > >> >> I support the right to birth control and abortion, but I wonder whether   
   > >> >> the government should be paying for it or forcing others to pay for it.   
   > >> >   
   > >> >In other words you don't support the right.   
   > >>   
   > >> It can't be a right if it infringes someone else's rights, you   
   > >> pathetic loon.   
   > >   
   > >Then religious hospitals have no *right* to impose their religious   
   > >beliefs on their medical practices, as that infringes on the rights of   
   > >the patients.   
   >   
   > Of course they do... it's the very same right that the management at   
   > GM has to tell the plants not to paint any cars pink.   Now do   
   > the loons on the far left think that infringes on the rights of people   
   > who want pink cars?   
      
   False analogy!   
      
   Car buyers can easily go to other car dealwers, or have their cars   
   painted pink after buying them, but not all patients who wind up in   
   religiously run hospitals have the choice of going to other hospitals.   
      
   And a rape victim who was also beaten up and then hospitalized in a   
   Catholic hospital who wants a morning after pill may well end up not   
   being able to get one.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)