XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.politics.liberalism, soc.culture.usa   
   XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: danielsan1977@gmail.com   
      
   On 3/3/2012 9:48 PM, Dånk 42Ø wrote:   
   > On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 20:44:41 -0600, Don Kresch wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:24:39 -0800, DanielSan   
   >> scrawled in blood:   
   >>   
   >>> On 3/3/2012 5:24 PM, Don Kresch wrote:   
   >>>> On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:10:28 -0700, Vurgil   scrawled   
   >>>> in blood:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> In article<3b55l7tf5nkdn5nbub66321u7klsb9cjr0@4ax.com>,   
   >>>>> Steve   wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 18:31:47 +0000 (UTC), 2907 Dead   
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:30:05 -0600, Dånk 42Ø wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I support the right to birth control and abortion, but I wonder   
   >>>>>>>> whether the government should be paying for it or forcing others   
   >>>>>>>> to pay for it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> In other words you don't support the right.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It can't be a right if it infringes someone else's rights, you   
   >>>>>> pathetic loon.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Then religious hospitals have no *right* to impose their religious   
   >>>>> beliefs on their medical practices, as that infringes on the rights   
   >>>>> of the patients.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> 	It's a business like any other. A jewish deli doesn't serve   
   >>>> pork--is that an infringement of the rights of the eaters?   
   >>>   
   >>> No, because pork-eaters can go to another deli.   
   >>   
   >> 	Irrelevant. Are you seriously suggesting that some things are   
   >> so special that they require laws to prevent "discrimination". Wow. Just   
   >> wow. How smugly self-absorbed can you get, Danny?   
   >>   
   >> Don   
   >> aa#51, Knight of BAAWA, Jedi Slackmaster Praise "Bob" or burn in   
   >> Slacklessness trying not to.   
   >   
   > So far nobody has addressed my main point, which is that religious   
   > organizations are perfectly free to drop coverage for all their employees.   
   >   
   > The Catholic church can be forced to provide birth control coverage in   
   > its health insurance plans, but it can't be forced to provide health   
   > insurance at all.  If the Catholic church wants to uphold its principles,   
   > it should drop all health insurance coverage for its employees, and let   
   > them Hope that Chairman Obama will pay for their coverage instead.   
      
   Then maybe they shouldn't be in the health insurance business if they   
   don't want to provide insurance for health care.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)