XPost: alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox, alt.christnet.christianlife   
      
   Indulge wanted us to know in responding to another poster:   
      
   "You can say what you will. You have your own methods of salvation, Your   
   own line of heritage for a person you call Jesus. Your own Mary Figure, her   
   own line of parentage not found in the bible, and on an on. So it would   
   seem rather obvious that your Jesus in has no bearing on God the Father,   
   and so on. Seems I misread or misunderstood the RC's teachings it has   
   nothing in common with the Christ of the bible. Just a form of godliness."   
      
   That sounded very familiar, then it struck me.  Two different but exactly   
   the same posts appeared before.   
      
   So I went back to find the relevant bits from that thread which was about   
   the line of Mary in scripture:   
      
   Who is the poster?  Both "Ivan Shakes and None@no.one posted and reposted   
   the same thing.   
      
   Asking for the poster, whoever he might be, to tell us of the "two Christs"   
   of which he wrote:   
      
   >We await now your exposition on how Christ as understood by all christians   
   >for 2000 years is different then your understanding of the Christ in   
   >scripture.   
      
   "The Jesus of the bible is of God. Yours isn't. Your exposition which is   
   baseless, means your Jesus is not the one spoken of in the Bible. So   
   everything in your religion is false, and a pretense."   
      
   Yup, very similar, a "two" Christ/Jesus theory and "false religion".  So   
   can Indulge or what ever names he is using reply?   
      
   One thinks we might have here a trinity of sock puppets, a "nest" of them.   
      
   In another ng "Ivan Shakes" went away and soon thereafter "Indulge" showed   
   up before surfacing here, humm.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)