XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.recovery.catholicism, al   
   .religion.christian.catholic   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic   
   From: nhrafan1@gmail.com   
      
   On 6/23/2016 6:32 PM, Rod wrote:   
   > Matt Singer (out.of.key@wyebur.con): "First Amendment Debate Erupts and   
   > [declares] 'It's a Hate Crime'"   
   >   
   > Josh Rosenbluth (noway@nowhere): "It does indicate that they do not   
   > believe hate crimes criminalize thought and speech because that would be   
   > unconstitutional."   
   >   
   > Matt Singer (out.of.key@wyebur.con): "No, it doesn't indicate that at all."   
   >   
   > Josh Rosenbluth (noway@nowhere): "If they thought it criminalized   
   > thought and speech they would have found it unconstitutional.  Instead,   
   > they said, 'the ordinance at issue there was explicitly directed at   
   > speech, while the one here is aimed at conduct unprotected by the First   
   > Amendment.'"   
   >   
      
     Do you see thought police enforcing your claims? No...you don't see   
     anyone doing it. That is because your claims are the height of absurdity.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)