XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.bible, alt.christian.religion
XPost: aus.legal
From: dx7066801@gmail.com
On 2/13/2017 6:11 PM, dolf wrote:
> ROD (FASCIST CATHOLIC) EASTMAN:
>
> You have been previously advised in writing that your American fascist
> dehumanising Internet conduct as unreasonable hate speech such as this
> "There is no refuting crazy Dolt...it just is as you just are" is knowingly
> untruthful and systematic mischaracterisations of me as slander in
> constituting treasonable crimes made against humanity as to be a war crime.
>
>
> For which an Universal Jurisdiction is claimed and the jurisdiction as the
> Sovereign laws of Australia will apply.
>
> I can sustain my factual belief which has a transcendent prerogative to
> your insubstantial belief, non-belief or disbelief and unlike yours,
> established by a compliant natural / common law statement as a claim of an
> egalitarian right.
>
> I have on 13 February, 2017 begun the process of formerly lobbying for a
> special tribunal to be established to determine all such claims which are
> numerous and both national and international as the source of delinquent
> and habitual crimes.
>
> You are still evading reality by attempting to unlawfully establish your
> fascist piety as Roman Catholic Church by an indolent attitude towards
> others.
>
> As this will take some considerable time for due legal process to occur,
> the best that I can do at present, is to persevere in the face of your
> unlawful and publicly debauched conduct.
>
> And make all notations of my opposition within Google archives so that a
> lawyer can subsequently review and action each claim in turn, at some
> future date.
You have already been cautioned that anything you say
will
> be presented within a court of law as claim of crimes against humanity as
> war crimes which I am intended against you the poster claiming to be ROD
> (FASCIST CATHOLIC) EASTMAN by determined means as is lawfully available to
> me as an unwavering commit to freedom, liberty, duty and virtue.
-
dolf
>
> Rod wrote:
>> On 2/13/2017 4:27 PM, dolf wrote:
>>> Again, I would caution you to cease making anonymous propagandist
>>> untruthful claims of a 400 years (Julian v's Gregorian v's Dead Sea Scrolls
>>> Calendars) association with a 2000 years dynamic.
>>>
>>> As that is a breach of my superior intellectual property which is
>>> associated to a theoretical mathematical noumenon accessible at the URL
>>> below.
>>>
>>> You ought to either properly distinguish your historical claims from my
>>> Intellectual Property or give appropriate acknowledgement.
>>>
>>> So far you have been unable to convey any differentiated clarity of terms,
>>> apart from improperly making insubstantial and deliberately erroneous
>>> semantical associations of the being equivalence.
>>>
>>> You must cease your fraudulent conduct at once because I have no intention
>>> of there ever being such equitable association between us, unless it is by
>>> negotiated terms of use conveyed by a written agreement.
>>>
- dolf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> One poster in the days a couple of years ago when first exposed to the
>>>> unbroken christian witness and church history these 2000 years had a novel
>>>> idea.
>>>>
>>>> He confessed proudly a complete ignorance of church history but thought
>>>> nonetheless there was a "400 year gap" after Acts.
>>>>
>>>> Here one can find the writings of the christian witness starting in the
1st
>>>> century until 325 AD:
>>>>
>>>> Ante-Nicene Fathers - Wikisource, the free online library
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ante-Nicene_Fathers
>>>>
>>>> This is a 10 volume set of encyclopedia size books in print, here the same
>>>> thing in english for easy reading.
>>>>
>>>> The first volume is the "apostolic fathers", by which is meant those
>>>> writings done by students of the apostles.
>>>>
>>>> The second volume continues with the students of the apostolic fathers and
>>>> others.
>>>>
>>>> In these first two volumes alone among many other things they teach what
>>>> they had been handed down about the:
>>>>
>>>> * question of "flesh/blood" of communion.
>>>>
>>>> * baptism as being "born again.
>>>>
>>>> * the content of church sunday liturgy worship
>>>> , including the eucharist,.
>>>>
>>>> * the church organization of bishops etc. at the turn of the 1st century
>>>> .
>>>> * the elements of doctrine that would later be expressed about trinity in
>>>> the creed.
>>>>
>>>> * the continuation of identifying and teaching against heresy to define
>>>> which group was really a valid christian group that had continued the
>>>> genuine teachings of the apostles and Christ..
>>>>
>>>> * discussion and making lists about which of the various writings they had
>>>> on hand that might be included in a canon of what was later to be the NT.
>>>>
>>>> this is but a tiny bit of course of what one finds in these christian
>>>> witnesses..
>>>>
>>>> Bottom line, no "gap" in sight, just the continuation of those witnesses
in
>>>> the church Christ had formed.
>>>>
>>>> The church He said against which evil would not prevail; even for 400
years
>>>> or any time least we make Him a liar..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Servant has you blocked and kill filed, Dolt Loon. Your warnings
>> are in vain. YOU must sue.
>>
>
>
>
DOLT...I have killfiled you on every group that I sub to,
however you are free to spam my email with your insane
ramblings...
Thanks for the laughs !
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
