XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.politics.democrats.d   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message   
   news:v42rQ.383915$l%O3.194508@fx18.iad...   
   > On 8/25/2025 10:35 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless   
   > chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> "Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message   
   >> news:lz%pQ.214504$nuHb.31335@fx10.iad...   
   >>> On 8/22/2025 6:03 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless   
   >>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message   
   >>>> news:pqIpQ.9143$5E6d.6412@fx38.iad...   
   >>>>> On 8/21/2025 8:15 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless   
   >>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:BzrpQ.28522$LeZ.7931@fx11.iad...   
   >>>>>>> On 8/20/2025 6:43 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and   
   >>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and   
   >>>>>>> lied:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:RwHnQ.32246$CQJe.9174@fx14.iad...   
   >>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2025 4:14 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and   
   >>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled   
   >>>>>>>>> and lied:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> "J Carlson" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>> news:107l95h$kvlr$1@dont- email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/2025 3:04 AM, "Attila," 84+ year old geriatric lying   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Nazi shitbag and rapist, lied:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 01:53:10 +0000, Mitchell Holman   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Governor Swill wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:h89q9klkic25u0ba9bk1cppoma7or55rhh@4ax.com:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:50:02 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-08-12, Attila wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In today's environment no statement should be accepted as   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being true without verification.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trust but verify.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same in my state.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signature is also verified although I do wonder how accurate   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because my lawyer friend once advised me to make my   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signature   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> illegible and change the style often. Which I do.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the real question which the dims ignore is why are they so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vehemently opposed to voter ID?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because Republicans are for it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need to show my driver's license to buy cough syrup for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goodness   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sakes.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seriously?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason is obvious.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The dims will have their cheating machine shutdown.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no other logical reason.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, there is. Republicans are *for* it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Republican agenda is to make voting so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> hard and smear it so long that they can eliminate   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> it entirely.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. Voting is easy and there are several options.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You want to remove the options and make it harder, you subhuman   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Nazi filth.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Only the illegal options   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> There aren't any, scooter. Every state only implements legal   
   >>>>>>>>> options.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If that were true   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It is true, scooter.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Prove it then....   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> By definition, scooter, any voting option that a state has available   
   >>>>> on election day is legal *on election day*.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Even if later these determined to be illegal, biased, or otherwise   
   >>>> utterly contrary to the ideal of free, fair and honest elections.   
   >>>   
   >>> No voting method has been found to be that, scooter.   
   >>   
   >> So much for any assertion by Rudy that he knows what he is talking about   
   >>   
   >> [stuff that is not voting methods erased]   
   >   
   > No voting method has been found after the fact to be "illegal,   
   > biased, or otherwise utterly contrary to the ideal of free, fair and   
   > honest elections," scooter.   
      
   Rudy demonstrates his utter ignorance of history.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|