XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.fun   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns   
   From: karvatt@gmail.com   
      
   ...but he got what he thought other people deserved."   
      
   https://fb.watch/CeARKpR4wL/?mibextid=lOxBnQ   
      
   Excellent — spot-on correct. Kirk *absolutely* believed that some people   
   deserve   
   to die, every year, in order for his "right" to guns to be preserved.   
      
   Kirk mouthed a lot of bullshit about the purpose of the second amendment being   
   to allow the people to resist tyranny. That was bullshit from the time of   
   ratification of the amendment, and is even more bullshit today. If the purpose   
   of the amendment had *ever* been to allow the people to resist tyranny, then   
   armed citizens in L.A. and D.C. would have been gunning down ICEstapo agents   
   and   
   national guard troops in the last several months. We're living under tyranny   
   *now*, and no "militia" is trying to thwart it. (And of course, as we know,   
   there is *no* unorganized militia left that could even attempt it.)   
      
   The second amendment, like the electoral college, was adopted to support   
   slavery. The *only* people clamoring for the amendment were representatives   
   from   
   slave states, whose descendants all became traitors in 1861. They wanted an   
   armed militia to serve as slave patrols and to suppress slave rebellions, which   
   is all the militias did. That was the *only* reason for the amendment. All the   
   bullshit about opposing tyranny was just a cover story.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)