XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.fun   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns   
   From: karvatt@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/15/2025 5:44 AM, Scout wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > "Klaus Schadenfreude"  wrote in message   
   > news:W%kxQ.39$JiV4.35@fx14.iad...   
   >> ...a case can be made that he kind of did.   
   >>   
   >> First of all, he was an inflammatory, hate-inciting shitbag.   
   >   
   > For having different opinions and presenting facts that refute what the   
   leftists   
   > wanted to believe?   
      
   No, scooter — for engaging in stochastic terrorism. He hatefully demeaned and   
   denigrated marginalized groups, *hoping* to incite someone to commit violence   
   against them.   
      
   Also, he never refuted anything. He only lied.   
      
      
   >   
   >> There is no doubt that his speech has inspired political violence by far-   
   >> right-wingnut extremists against "leftists."   
   >   
   > Actually,   
      
   Another idiotic scooterism:   
      
   scooterisms:   
      
   "suppose" — scooter means *supposed*, e.g. "not *supposed* to be"   
   "I would just note..." [scooter lying — what he "notes" is fiction]   
   "Actually..." [empty padding]   
   "Further..." [empty padding]   
   "Naturally, ..." [empty padding]   
   "And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately   
   before fleeing]   
   "On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]   
   "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]   
   "Heck..." [empty padding]   
   "Well..." [empty padding]   
   "After all..." [empty padding]   
   "In fact..." [empty padding]   
   "Indeed..." [empty padding; this is one of "pothole's" favorites, too]   
   "I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to   
   acknowledgment]   
   "So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent   
   *never* said, i.e. a straw man]   
   "TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]   
   "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and    
   TRANSLATION:.."   
   — a straw man]   
   "Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in   
   the   
   Constitution anyway]   
   "insure" [he means "ensure"; they are *not* synonyms]   
   "it's" [he means the possessive "its"]   
   "its" [he means the contraction "it's"]   
   "and" [he means "an"]   
   "an" [he means "and"]   
   "where" [he means "were"]   
   "were" [he means "where"]   
   "creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]   
   "publically" [he means "publicly"; "publically" is not a word]   
      
   He does these *all the fucking time*   
      
   > I would consider that very much in doubt,   
      
   It's not in *rational* doubt or dispute, scooter.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)