Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.society.liberalism    |    An unfortunate mental disorder    |    6,487 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 5,211 of 6,487    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    Criminal charges against Bolton expected    |
|    11 Oct 25 08:22:02    |
      XPost: alt.government.employees, alt.politics.trump, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns       From: yourdime@outlook.com              The acting U.S. Attorney in Maryland is moving forward quickly to seek       criminal charges against President Donald Trump’s former national security       adviser John Bolton, according to two people familiar with the case.              A complaint or an indictment could come as early as next week, said the       sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters       without authorization.              A grand jury in Maryland has been hearing evidence for several weeks       related to claims that Bolton improperly kept classified national security       information in his Maryland home. But the pace of the case has recently       sped up, the two people said.              If Bolton is criminally charged as attorneys in the Maryland office       expect, he would be the third of Trump’s perceived enemies to face federal       prosecution under Trump’s Department of Justice in a matter of a few       weeks. Bolton, whom Trump fired from his first administration, has been a       vocal critic of the president. His lawyer has said he did nothing       improper.              Unlike the widespread resistance career prosecutors in Virginia have shown       to Trump’s pressure campaign to charge former FBI Director James Comey and       New York Attorney General Letitia James, career prosecutors in Maryland       consider charges against Bolton to have some factual merit, the people       said.              Kelly Hayes, the acting U.S. Attorney for Maryland, has told Justice       Department colleagues she believes there is a reasonable basis to pursue       charges against Bolton, the people said.              In Virginia, the first U.S. attorney installed by Trump resigned under       pressure after he pushed back against charging Comey and James. Both were       indicted after Trump made his personal attorney, Lindsey Halligan, the top       prosecutor in the commonwealth. She single-handedly presented evidence to       grand jurors in both cases.              Ed Martin, who served briefly as Trump’s acting U.S. attorney in the       District of Columbia and whom Trump has since named to head the Justice       Department’s Weaponization Working Group, has met multiple times with       Hayes to monitor the Bolton case.              According to one of the people familiar with the status of the case, Hayes       and her team are weighing whether to file charges against Bolton in a       rushed complaint — a court filing that would allow the office to lodge       criminal allegations quickly and seek a grand jury indictment at a later       date.              FBI agents conducted a surprise raid of Bolton’s home in Bethesda,       Maryland, on Sept. 22 in what sources at the time said was a search for       suspected classified records. The search warrant was based on information       provided by the CIA and approved by a federal judge. On the same day of       the search, FBI Director Kash Patel circulated a social media post on X       that read: “NO ONE is above the law... @FBI agents on mission.”              Bolton’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, has repeatedly said that documents with       classified markings kept by Bolton dated back to the George W. Bush       administration, when Bolton served as U.S. ambassador to the United       Nations, and would be typical of those kept by a long-time government       employee.              “An objective and thorough review will show nothing inappropriate was       stored or kept by Ambassador Bolton,” Lowell said in a statement last       month.              Neither Lowell nor the Justice Department immediately returned requests       for comment on Friday.              Last month, a judge unsealed a heavily redacted version of the affidavit       of probable cause used by the FBI to support its search of Bolton’s home.              Page 12 of the document has a heading titled “Hack of Bolton’s AOL Account       by Foreign Entity.” That section is entirely blacked out.              Two people familiar with the matter told MSNBC that the redacted section       describes how the U.S. government discovered Bolton’s AOL emails during       intelligence collection directed at that unnamed foreign government. What       was found, they said, fueled an investigation into whether Bolton has       mishandled classified information that began during the Biden       administration.              The sources said that the sensitivity of how the government came by those       records was one factor that slowed the Bolton investigation. By moving       forward, they said, the United States has now revealed to a foreign       government that it has access to specific systems — a revelation, the       sources said, that is likely more damaging to U.S. national security than       any secret Bolton may have revealed.              https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/news/criminal-charges-bolton-expected-early-       week-rcna236926              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca