XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.politics.democrats.d
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: NoBody@nowhere.com
On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 15:37:41 -0500, super70s
wrote:
>> During that circus of an oversight hearing this past week, Blondi
>> refused to answer most questions posed to her by Democratic senators,
>> or she lied. She said she "didn't know" if there is a video/audio
>> recording of the crook Tom Homan accepting a $50,000 cash bribe. That's
>> a lie. She cannot NOT know of the recording.
>>
>> Adam Schiff, rather than pose legitimate questions to the dirty whore
>> Blondi that he knew she would either not answer or give lie answers,
>> instead used his time to recite all the questions the whore Blondi had
>> refused to answer. One of them was whether the attacks on boats in the
>> Caribbean are legal, which of course the dirty whore Blondi refused to
>> answer. But when Schiff mentioned that one, the dirty whore Blondi
>> sneered, "Do you have a law degree, senator?" As a matter of fact,
>> Schiff's law degree is from Harvard, 1985, cum laude. The dirty whore
>> Blondi's law degree? From some fucking backwater called Stetson College
>> of Law, 1990. It's not even clear that it's an accredited law school.
>>
>> Blondi's canned, staged, rehearsed performance before that oversight
>> committee should lead to her impeachment and removal from office, and
>> to her disbarment.
>
>You have to wonder why they even bother with these kabuki dance
>hearings for any current Republican official or judicial appointment.
>Say one thing and then do a 180-degree after they're confirmed.
>
>Maybe it provides good material for SNL cold opens but that's about it.
The hearings themselves were for nothing more than the Dems to perform
and not allow any questions to answered.
Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
