XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.fun   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns   
   From: MeanDog@NoLefties.dot   
      
   On Thu, 16 Oct 2025 02:20:52 +0000, Mitchell Holman    
   wrote:   
      
   >Attila wrote in   
   >news:5e00fktjfmlqdqs4d6thk6sltvjvqpqmi8@4ax.com:   
   >   
   >> On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:28:49 -0700, nickname unavailable   
   >> <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_taken"@gmail.com> in alt.atheism   
   >> with message-id wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On 10/15/2025 12:30 AM, Attila wrote:   
   >>>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 02:30:58 +0000, Mitchell Holman   
   >>>> in alt.atheism with message-id   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> "Scout" wrote in   
   >>>>> news:10cmt7j$3bi15$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Attila" wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:56dtektkuimtbidskj24681mv4bi17a8fm@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 15:21:47 -0700, nickname unavailable   
   >>>>>>> <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_taken"@gmail.com> in alt.atheism   
   >>>>>>> with message-id <0GfGQ.311385$2R62.62622@fx13.iad> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If you're using undocumented people's tax records to find them   
   >>>>>>>> and kidnap them,   
   >>>>>>>> then it was never about them not paying taxes.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Legal deportation is not kidnapping.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If you're showing up at their places of employment, then it was   
   >>>>>>>> never about them   
   >>>>>>>> not working.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Correct.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If you're showing up and kidnapping them at courthouses, then it   
   >>>>>>>> was never about   
   >>>>>>>> them not doing it "the right way."   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The right was is to not enter the country illegally.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If you're kidnapping women and children, then it was never about   
   >>>>>>>> criminals.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Legal deportation is not kidnapping.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If you're not giving them due process, then it was never about   
   >>>>>>>> the Constitution.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> They did not seek "due process" when they sneaked in   
   >>>>>>> illegally.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Seems to me that process dates back to Obama who allowed expedited   
   >>>>>> deportation without a trial.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> There is no such thing as a deportation trial.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> They ARE required to have a hearing.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Which Obama provided.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And Trump does not.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No hearing was required for illegal entry.   
   >>>   
   >>>The immigrants don't owe anyone any "hearing." They do not owe anyone   
   >>>due process. They are *entitled* to due process when the state is   
   >>>depriving them of liberty and property.   
   >>   
   >> That is a court ruling, and I disagree.   
   >   
   >   
   >It is not a court ruling, it is the CONSTITUTION.   
   >   
   >"nor shall any State deprive any person of life,   
   >liberty, or property, without due process of law;   
   >nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction   
   >the equal protection of the laws."   
   >   
   >   
   >Not any citizen.   
   >   
   >ANY PERSON   
      
   The illegals are getting the due process they are legally entitled to.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|